10.04.2013 Views

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The maximum concentration of radioactivity has been limited through<br />

proposed waste acceptance criteria to limit the effects of routine and<br />

accidental exposures from transport and emplacement operations such<br />

that dose constraints are achieved and improved upon.<br />

Additional waste acceptance criteria have been proposed to further limit<br />

exposure. For example, a constraint on the external dose on the transport<br />

package has been proposed which is more constraining than required by<br />

transport regulations.<br />

Operational arrangements have been proposed to further reduce<br />

exposure, including for example, no loose handling of materials, the use<br />

of suitable cover materials, the use of segregation arrangements, the use<br />

of contamination clearance and control arrangements, the use of<br />

personnel, workplace and environmental monitoring and the use of<br />

emergency arrangements.<br />

11.2.11The likely result of these additional measures will be that the risk presented by<br />

the waste disposal will be less than the design risk target over the long term and<br />

that occupational dose to workers will be well within the dose constraints.<br />

11.2.12Can further measures be implemented?<br />

The two principal possible further restrictions are to further limit the<br />

radiological capacity or to further limit the radioactivity concentration.<br />

The long term risks are driven by the total activity disposed. Further<br />

reductions in the capacity are not reasonably practicable because the<br />

capacity has been designed to a basic risk target that meets current<br />

guidance and in practice the further optimisation measures described<br />

above will reduce the risk still further. The capacities that result are of a<br />

size to be useful and economic for the decommissioning industry and<br />

reductions would make the waste route considerably less able to meet<br />

regional demand.<br />

The short term risks are driven by the concentration of activity and<br />

resulting doserate in any one package of waste for any given isotope<br />

type. The concentrations and doserates have been optimised through<br />

application of restrictive waste acceptance criteria and further restrictions<br />

are not required in order to achieve the occupational dose constraints for<br />

workers (based on those workers using the constraints applicable to the<br />

public). In practice the ALARA and BPM arrangements described above<br />

will further reduce exposures. The proposed radioactivity concentrations<br />

and doserate criteria are of practical use for the decommissioning industry<br />

and further reductions would severely limit the applicability of the waste<br />

route to solve the strategic drivers described above.<br />

Application for disposal of LLW including HV-VLLW under RSA 1993,<br />

for the East Northants Resource Management Facility:<br />

Supporting Information<br />

July 2009<br />

99<br />

WS010001/ENRMF/CONSAPP<strong>CRF</strong> 418

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!