10.04.2013 Views

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

management option will allow current stockpiles of waste to be disposed<br />

safely and hence not leave the issue to future generations.<br />

Technical Benefit: Some of the waste that will be labelled as LLW from<br />

the nuclear industry will be essentially clean demolition materials that for<br />

technical reasons cannot be proven to be clean for free release. Such<br />

projects are currently difficult to undertake and the provision of a new<br />

LLW management option will enable such projects to proceed.<br />

Regional Scale: One approach for the provision of new LLW<br />

management options is to provide specialised landfill facilities at the site<br />

of origin. However, this could result in many relatively small landfills<br />

being constructed across the UK at the existing nuclear sites, many of<br />

which are not in favourable geological settings for such uses. As is the<br />

case for conventional wastes, it is reasonable to propose that regional<br />

solutions which balance transport distance with economies of scale are<br />

worth consideration. The transport of LLW with low specific activity does<br />

not present challenging hazards because of the very low levels of<br />

radioactivity involved. The amounts are small compared to conventional<br />

wastes and will be generated slowly over several decades. A LLW<br />

disposal route at the East Northants Resource Management Facility site<br />

could serve multiple nuclear industry sites. There are few such well<br />

engineered sites in the UK. The UK Nuclear Industry Strategy (ref 20)<br />

notes that whilst transport and proximity are important considerations<br />

when considered on a national level the issue is not a strong differentiator<br />

between options because the additional impact to transport infrastructure<br />

or carbon emissions is low. The proposal in this case would not result in<br />

a net increase in traffic to the site because the annual tonnage capacity<br />

limit is unchanged.<br />

International Experience: Other countries that have progressed with the<br />

clean-up of their nuclear legacies have found great benefit from having<br />

waste routes for LLW disposal to landfill. There are examples from the<br />

USA and both Spain and France have recently opened such a route.<br />

UK Government Policy: Advisory committees in the UK have examined<br />

the case for provision of such waste routes (ref 5) and concluded that<br />

government policy should be supportive. Government policy in this area<br />

has recently been revised and enables the provision of landfill waste<br />

routes for LLW under appropriate circumstances (ref 3). The UK Nuclear<br />

Industry LLW Strategy is supportive of the option (ref 20).<br />

Low Level Waste Repository (LLWR) Acceptance Criteria: The LLW<br />

Repository Ltd criteria for waste acceptance at the disposal facility near<br />

the village of Drigg, Cumbria states that: “Waste shall not be Consigned<br />

for disposal if reasonably practicable measures could be adopted to<br />

segregate it from other arisings such that disposal is possible as any of<br />

the following: very low level waste, low level waste in domestic refuse or<br />

as a special precautions disposal at suitable landfill sites”. This is<br />

consistent with government policy.<br />

Application for disposal of LLW including HV-VLLW under RSA 1993,<br />

for the East Northants Resource Management Facility:<br />

Supporting Information<br />

July 2009<br />

26<br />

WS010001/ENRMF/CONSAPP<strong>CRF</strong> 345

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!