10.04.2013 Views

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8.16.5 The likely conclusion is that the landfill can receive unlimited amounts of these<br />

nuclides at up to 200 Bq/g without exceeding the radiological capacity before<br />

reaching the physical capacity. For those highlighted nuclides their effect in<br />

practice will be reduced by being parts of mixtures with other nuclides and at<br />

average concentrations less than 200 Bq/g. Several of the most restrictive<br />

nuclides are short half-life and will generally not feature in decommissioning<br />

wastes in significant concentrations.<br />

8.16.6 Notwithstanding the overall conclusion that capacity is not particularly restricted<br />

in this case, the proposal is that the capacity of the landfill is subject to a total<br />

capacity limit combined with a series of other conditions. The total capacity limit<br />

would apply from the date of issue until closure of the landfill or until the capacity<br />

is reached. The landfill would receive no more LLW under the permit once the<br />

capacity limit is reached. The capacity limit cannot be expressed as a single<br />

number because it depends on the mixture received up to any point in time, so<br />

the proposal is for a continuously revised capacity limit based on individual<br />

nuclides (including appropriate daughter chains). The total capacity limit would<br />

be established using an authorised spreadsheet model agreed with the regulator.<br />

The spreadsheet model would represent the most restrictive case from the risk<br />

assessment and would produce as an output the remaining capacity of the landfill<br />

on an individual nuclide basis given the exact wastes received to that point in<br />

time. Prior to accepting any further waste the model would be used by the landfill<br />

operator to determine that the consignment would not lead to a breach of the<br />

total capacity limit. This approach has a number of features:<br />

The approach requires a comprehensive level of waste characterisation by the<br />

consignors, but this is considered practicable and is optimal for ensuring public<br />

health is not impacted by imprecise waste assay. This is also sustainable<br />

because future generations will receive comprehensive information on the<br />

disposed nuclides enabling them to make informed decisions.<br />

The approach cannot be expressed as a simple number and hence may be less<br />

transparent to the public, but the approach is highly transparent and detailed to<br />

the regulator.<br />

The approach is “modern” in the sense that it aligns the authorisation with the risk<br />

assessment. This is in line with proposals to use risk based approaches for RSA<br />

exemptions orders, waste definitions, clearance definitions and nuclear site<br />

delicensing conditions. Hence the criteria used to produce the waste, to<br />

categorise the waste and to dispose of the waste are based on a consistent risk<br />

based approach that can be expressed in common terms of risk and dose.<br />

The approach is based on the total life cycle of the facility. This addresses a<br />

potential public concern that the authorised capacity may “creep” upwards at the<br />

point of annual reviews. Authorisation creep of this type was identified as a<br />

concern from the pre-application stakeholder workshops.<br />

Application for disposal of LLW including HV-VLLW under RSA 1993,<br />

for the East Northants Resource Management Facility:<br />

Supporting Information<br />

July 2009<br />

88<br />

WS010001/ENRMF/CONSAPP<strong>CRF</strong> 407

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!