10.04.2013 Views

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Radiological Assessment 0820-2<br />

Version 2<br />

groundwater and intrusion. Specific doses through at least one of these routes are<br />

higher than the corresponding doses through irradiation, and irradiation will not<br />

therefore determine the overall capacity. The aerosol and leachate spillage pathways<br />

are all highly uncertain, both in terms of the possibility of occurring and duration.<br />

The specific doses presented in Section 5 are illustrative, and might be considered in<br />

establishing mitigation measures, but should not be used to determine overall<br />

capacities.<br />

The specific doses calculated as a result of off-site leachate management are based on<br />

a generic model for a sewage treatment plant, with significant uncertainties regarding<br />

the extent of dilution by other waste streams and the type and fat of effluents. This<br />

model again calculates specific doses based on unit radioactivity inputs. As discussed<br />

elsewhere, there are large uncertainties about the rate at which radionuclides would<br />

enter the leachate at the ENRMF. Conservative assumptions have been made so that<br />

future doses arising from releases to groundwater or accidental spillage of leachate<br />

can be calculated. It would, however, be unreasonable to apply these same<br />

assumptions to the routine management of leachate during the operational period.<br />

Even if the same generic model for the sewage treatment plant is used to estimate<br />

specific doses, it would be more appropriate to determine a permissible level of<br />

radioactivity in leachate and then to develop authorisation conditions from these.<br />

Monitoring of leachate would ensure compliance with these conditions and give more<br />

control than applying conservative assumptions.<br />

As discussed in Section 3.2.1, two dose criteria have been used to determine<br />

radiological capacity. For exposures arising from releases to groundwater and<br />

subsequent use of an existing borehole for irrigation purposes, a dose criterion of<br />

20 Sv / year has been used. For exposures resulting from intrusion into the waste,<br />

from excavation and subsequent use of waste as soil, and from consumption of<br />

groundwater extracted from close to the site boundary, a dose criterion of 3 mSv /<br />

year has been used.<br />

6.2 Radionuclide-specific radiological capacities<br />

Tables 6.1 to 6.3 present specific doses and the corresponding radionuclide-specific<br />

capacities for the two groundwater pathways and the principal intrusion pathway<br />

described in Sections 4 and 5.<br />

Radionuclide<br />

Specific<br />

dose<br />

(μSv y -1 per<br />

MBq)<br />

Radiological<br />

capacity<br />

(MBq)<br />

Radionuclide<br />

Specific<br />

dose<br />

(μSv y -1 per<br />

MBq)<br />

Radiological<br />

capacity<br />

(MBq)<br />

H-3 3.66E-30 5.47E+30 Ra-226 1.56E-08 1.28E+09<br />

C-14 2.06E-09 9.69E+09 Ac-227 5.66E-26 3.53E+26<br />

Cl-36 6.52E-08 3.07E+08 Th-229 1.44E-08 1.39E+09<br />

Fe-55 1.04E-43 1.92E+44 Th-230 8.24E-09 2.43E+09<br />

Co-60 1.21E-39 1.65E+40 Th-232 4.04E-08 4.95E+08<br />

Galson Sciences Limited 60 14 July 2009<br />

WS010001/ENRMF/CONSAPP<strong>CRF</strong> 610

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!