10.04.2013 Views

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the assumption that doses from water treatment would be similar to doses from<br />

sewage treatment. The Environment Agency’s methodology allows for a range of<br />

exposure groups affected by releases to a public sewer, depending on the<br />

discharge route for treated effluent. For this assessment, only the groups<br />

associated directly with operation of the treatment plant, farming of land<br />

conditioned by sludge or using the estuary are considered. These groups and<br />

the relevant exposure pathways are:<br />

Sewage treatment workers (adults only)<br />

External irradiation from radionuclides in raw sewage and sludge<br />

Inadvertent inhalation and ingestion of raw sewage and sludge containing<br />

radionuclides<br />

Farming family living on land conditioned with sewage sludge<br />

Consumption of food produced on land conditioned with sludge and<br />

incorporating radionuclides<br />

External irradiation from radionuclides in sludge conditioned soil<br />

Inadvertent inhalation and ingestion of sludge conditioned soil<br />

Fisherman’s family (estuary/coastal water receives treated effluent from sewage<br />

works, typically via a river)<br />

External irradiation from radionuclides deposited in sediments<br />

Consumption of fish incorporating radionuclides<br />

8.6.5 The results in Annex B are expressed as specific dose per MBq/year of activity in<br />

the leachate treated. The groundwater assessment uses a very pessimistic<br />

assumption regarding leachate concentrations which it is not appropriate to use<br />

in this assessment. There is no empirical evidence on which to base leachate<br />

activity concentrations.<br />

8.6.6 The worst case result is for Th-232 with the “farming family” public exposure<br />

group. If we assume a dose constraint of 0.3 mSv/yr for the public during the<br />

operational phase, the results indicate that the maximum allowable leachate<br />

discharge per year is 216 MBq if the leachate only comprised Th-232.<br />

8.6.7 The proposed approach is that this scenario is not used to constrain radiological<br />

capacity, but that it is used to derive authorisation discharge limits for the<br />

leachate which can then be subsequently refined when empirical monitoring<br />

results become available. Based upon the above approach the authorisation<br />

limits for individual nuclides if the leachate comprised 100% of that nuclide, with a<br />

0.3 mSv/y dose criterion are given in the following table. In practice authorisation<br />

discharge limits will be set after discussion with the Environment Agency and<br />

then optimized through operational experience such that restrictive dose criterion<br />

are met.<br />

Application for disposal of LLW including HV-VLLW under RSA 1993,<br />

for the East Northants Resource Management Facility:<br />

Supporting Information<br />

July 2009<br />

69<br />

WS010001/ENRMF/CONSAPP<strong>CRF</strong> 388

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!