10.04.2013 Views

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

Appendix CRF - Part 3 - Northamptonshire County Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Objective/Principle/Requirement from Guidance on Requirements<br />

for Authorisation<br />

radioactive waste, the effective dose from the facility to a<br />

representative member of the critical group should not exceed a<br />

source-related dose constraint of 0.3 mSv/year.<br />

R7: After the period of authorisation, the assessed radiological risk<br />

from a disposal facility to a person representative of those at greatest<br />

risk should be consistent with a risk guidance level of 10 -6 per year (i.e.<br />

1 in a million per year).<br />

R8: The developer/operator of a near-surface disposal facility should<br />

assess the potential consequences of human intrusion into the facility<br />

after the period of authorisation on the basis that it is likely to occur.<br />

The developer/operator should, however, consider and implement any<br />

practical measures that might reduce the chance of its happening.<br />

The assessed effective dose to any person during and after the<br />

assumed intrusion should be consistent with a dose guidance level in<br />

the range of around 3 mSv/year to around 20 mSv/year.<br />

R9: The choice of waste acceptance criteria, how the selected site is<br />

used and the design, construction, operation, closure and post-closure<br />

management of the disposal facility should ensure that radiological<br />

risks to members of the public and to the environment, both during the<br />

period of authorisation and afterwards, are as low as reasonably<br />

achievable (ALARA), taking into account economic and social factors.<br />

R10: The developer/operator should carry out an assessment to show<br />

that the radiological effects of a disposal facility on the accessible<br />

environment are acceptably low, both during the period of<br />

authorisation and afterwards.<br />

R11: The developer/operator of a disposal facility for solid radioactive<br />

waste should demonstrate that the disposal system provides adequate<br />

protection against non-radiological hazards.<br />

R12: n/a<br />

R13: The developer/operator of a disposal facility for solid radioactive<br />

waste should make sure that the site is used and the facility is<br />

designed, constructed, operated and capable of closure so as to avoid<br />

unacceptable effects on the performance of the disposal system.<br />

R14: The developer/operator of a disposal facility for solid radioactive<br />

waste should establish waste acceptance criteria consistent with the<br />

assumptions made in the environmental safety case and with the<br />

requirements for transport and handling, and demonstrate that these<br />

can be applied during operations at the facility.<br />

R15: In support of the environmental safety case, the<br />

developer/operator of a disposal facility for solid radioactive waste<br />

should carry out a programme to monitor for changes caused by<br />

construction, operation and closure of the facility.<br />

Application for disposal of LLW including HV-VLLW under RSA 1993,<br />

for the East Northants Resource Management Facility:<br />

Supporting Information<br />

Addressed by…<br />

Section 8.0<br />

Section 8.0<br />

Section 5.0 and<br />

9.0<br />

Section 8.0 and<br />

14.0<br />

Section 9.2 and<br />

12.0<br />

Section 2.0 and<br />

9.0<br />

Section 9.0<br />

Section 5.8<br />

July 2009<br />

29<br />

WS010001/ENRMF/CONSAPP<strong>CRF</strong> 348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!