10.04.2013 Views

1 Earliest Rome

1 Earliest Rome

1 Earliest Rome

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8. P R I E S T S A N D P R I E S T E S S E S<br />

8.10 Pagan priesthood under attack<br />

Priesthood and the activities of priests provided a major focus of debate in the<br />

conflict between pagans and Christians. This was not just a matter of the supposed<br />

immorality of pagan priests (both traditional and oriental). It was also a<br />

matter of the definition of imperial power. For the image of the emperor had<br />

in part been constructed around the image of the pagan priest. To present oneself<br />

as a Christian emperor meant renegotiating that image of priesthood.<br />

See further: Bowersock (1986).<br />

8.10a Priests and immorality<br />

Minucius Felix, Octavius 25.10-11<br />

Here Minucius Felix ridicules the supposed purity of the vestal Virgins (see<br />

8.4) and suggests that pagan priesthoods in general were little more than a<br />

'cover' for immorality.<br />

See further: Clarke (1974) 307.<br />

You might choose to argue that among the pagans virgins were more chaste or that priests<br />

were more religious. But in fact more of their virgins than not were proven guilty of<br />

unchastity 1<br />

- no doubt without Vesta's knowledge; and as for the rest it was not stricter<br />

chastity but better luck in their immorality that saved them from punishment. And<br />

where are more debaucheries arranged, where is more pimping practised, more adultery<br />

planned than by priests at their altars and temples? Indeed the flames of lust more often<br />

have their way in sacristans' storerooms than in actual brothels.<br />

1. There are some recorded instances of Vestal Virgins convicted of breaking their vow of<br />

chastity (see 6.6b; 8.4a); but it was not the regular occurrence that Minucius Felix states.<br />

8.10b The emperor Gratian (A.D. 375-383) refuses the pontifical robe<br />

Zosimus, New History 1V.36<br />

The Christian emperor Gratian was the first to sever the link between the position<br />

of Roman emperor and the office of pontifex maximus. Here the later<br />

pagan writer Zosimus offers a disapproving account of the emperor's rejection<br />

of the priesthood - implying that Gratian's neglect of the office brought about<br />

his downfall. Although later emperors followed Gratian's example, the title of<br />

pontifex maximus was eventually taken over (and is still used) by the Christian<br />

pope.<br />

See further: Vol. 1, 372, 374; Alan Cameron (1968); Matthews (1975)<br />

203-5*; Geffcken (1978) 159-77; and, for the papal title, Kajanto (1981).<br />

It was the custom for each emperor, at the same time as he took overall command, to be<br />

offered the priestly robe by the pontifices and to be given the title pontifex maximus - in<br />

214

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!