September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front
September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front
September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
source of the fabricated evidence, which was used to “justify” the invasion and<br />
occupation of Iraq.<br />
"Precisely because of the qualms the administration encountered, it created a rogue intelligence<br />
operation, the Office of Special Plans (OSP), located within the Pentagon and under the control of neoconservatives.<br />
The OSP roamed outside the ordinary inter-agency process, stamping its approval on<br />
stories from Iraqi exiles that the other agencies dismissed as lacking credibility, and feeding them to<br />
the president. At the same time, constant pressure was applied to the intelligence agencies to force their<br />
compliance. In one case, a senior intelligence officer who refused to buckle under was removed."<br />
[NEWS BRIEF: "There was no failure of intelligence: US spies were ignored, or worse, if they failed<br />
to make the case for war", The Guardian (London), February 5, 2004, carried in Daily News Updates<br />
2/8/2004.,http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,<strong>11</strong>4<strong>11</strong>16,00.html ]<br />
These fabrications which took America to war with Iraq were based on a long standing<br />
Likud policy paper authored by Perle and Feith in 1996.<br />
"The OSP and the other members of the networks that operated throughout key US agencies shared a<br />
right-wing, pro-militarist ideology and are fanatically pro-Israel. Feith and Perle authored an infamous<br />
policy paper in 1996 for the Likud Party extremist, Benjamin Netanyahu, entitled “A Clean Break: A<br />
New Strategy for Securing the Realm.” This strategy called for the destruction of Saddam Hussein and<br />
his replacement by a Hashemite monarch. Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and Iran would then have to<br />
be overthrown or destabilized for Israel to be secure in a kind of ‘Greater US-Israel Co-Prosperity<br />
Sphere.’ The OSP was an arm of the Wolfowitz-Feith policy of furthering the policies of the most<br />
extremist groups of the Sharon regime, forging close ties with a parallel ad hoc intelligence operation<br />
in the Israeli regime according to a report from the British newspaper, The Guardian" [“Who<br />
fabricated the Iraq War Threat: An Inside View” James Petras, Centre for Research on Globalisation,<br />
August 22, 2003]<br />
To that end, the invasion of Iraq was as much a foregone conclusion as was the invasion<br />
of Afghanistan. It was a decision made by this group years before ‘weapons of mass<br />
destruction’ were presented to the public as the excuse for invasion, and years before the<br />
attack on the World Trade Center. Nothing would have prevented the invasion, because<br />
it could easily have been prevented – and spared thousands of lives and injured.<br />
According to the Chicago Tribune, Saddam Hussein was more than ready to leave Iraq,<br />
just like the Taliban was ready to surrender Bin Laden, but the US Government chose to<br />
start a war instead.<br />
"As Trireme (Richard Perle’s and Henry Kissinger’s venture capital firm)solicited investors at the end<br />
of 2002, Harb al-Zuhair (a wealthy and politically connected Saudi businessman) made a trip to his<br />
native Iraq, and met with government officials including Saddam's intelligence chief -- Tahir Abd' Jalil<br />
Habbush al-Tiktriti, head of Iraq's Mukhabarat, or General Intelligence Service. He returned with an<br />
important message for the U.S. government: On the eve of war, Saddam wanted to throw in the towel,<br />
Zuhair reported to Khashoggi. The Iraqi dictator sought back channel negotiations with America that<br />
might offer him a safe exit. Harriman and Khashoggi decided to arrange for Zuhair to tell his story to<br />
Perle…."[Hersh uncovered Pentagon adviser Richard Perle’s role in securing homeland security<br />
contracts, David Jackson, Chicago Tribune, June 25, 2004]<br />
Both so called “conspiracy” interpretations (one in which oil interests are responsible,<br />
another in which pro-Israeli Neocons are responsible) provide compelling insights, and<br />
may explain the Bush administration’s behavior after the WTC tragedy, but do little to<br />
explain events leading up to the attack. The hard truth is, this tragedy was beginning to<br />
unfold long before Bush won the election, and before he won the Republican National<br />
THE SEPTEMBER <strong>11</strong> COMMISSION REPORT Page 109