06.05.2013 Views

September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of operations was Azerbaijan. (For the benefit of readers not familiar with the events of<br />

the Iran-Contra scandal, and how this group single-handedly turned the Carter-Reagan<br />

election in favor of Reagan, and how they subverted the will of Congress – these events<br />

are reviewed in Section 4.3 Richard Secord, UBS and the Azerbaijan Connection.)<br />

This is an extremely high-powered group of individuals which had been thoroughly<br />

tested on more than one occasion in its ability to execute large scale covert operations<br />

and maintain silence in the face of being ‘caught in the act.’ They were the “A” team.<br />

Their reunion in Azerbaijan demands an answer to the question: “Why was this high<br />

powered team working together in a small, impoverished corner of the world?” The<br />

answer to that question is revealed in this report. As their activities are disclosed, and the<br />

dots connected, it becomes clear that this group – more so than Osama Bin Laden and Al<br />

Qaeda - had the wherewithal to direct the events of <strong>September</strong> <strong>11</strong>. More importantly, it<br />

will be shown that Osama Bin Ladin (and his mujahedin) was a contractor to this group,<br />

and that even up to 2001, the press was reporting that Osama Bin Ladin was a<br />

‘figurehead’ for Al Qaeda, with the real leadership being unknown. Kimche, as an<br />

integral member of this “A” team, had developed a loyal following with ex-KGB agents<br />

he had helped escape to Israel, and had access to both the Mossad and the Russian/Israeli<br />

Mafiya. Together, this “A Team” had access to all the right resources, had connections to<br />

the same banks and had a vested interest in helping bring to an end the investigations into<br />

their gold and money-laundering, illegal bribes and securities fraud.<br />

There are three primary clues in the volumes of 9/<strong>11</strong> data that point to the conclusion that<br />

the attack on the WTC was an attempt to stop investigations into money-laundering. Each<br />

clue reinforces the legitimacy of the other clues. Those clues are:<br />

1. The accusation of Sibel Edmonds, an FBI translator who was silenced with a<br />

constraining order from public comment by Attorney General Ashcroft. After the<br />

attack on the World Trade Center, the FBI hired extra translators to help with a<br />

backlog of taped phone transmissions. One of these translators was Sibel Edmonds<br />

who has gone on public record accusing the Bush administration of covering up its<br />

knowledge of events which would help explain 9/<strong>11</strong>. Sibel Edmonds - after reading<br />

and interpreting raw intelligence data - contends that the 9/<strong>11</strong> perpetrators were<br />

protected by Dick Cheney’s “intelligence block” which prevented the investigation<br />

into terrorists. Since making her accusations, she has been silenced by a restraining<br />

order from US Attorney General Ashcroft, in the name of national security. The<br />

essence of her accusation is as follows:<br />

“To this date the public has not been told of intentional blocking of intelligence, and has not been<br />

told that certain information, despite its direct links, impacts and ties to terrorist related activities,<br />

is not given to or shared with Counterterrorism units, their investigations, and countering terrorism<br />

related activities. This was the case prior to 9/<strong>11</strong>, and remains in effect after 9/<strong>11</strong>. If<br />

Counterintelligence receives information that contains money laundering, illegal arms sale, and<br />

illegal drug activities, directly linked to terrorist activities; and if that information involves certain<br />

nations, certain semi-legit organizations, and ties to certain lucrative or political relations in this<br />

country, then, that information is not shared with Counterterrorism, regardless of the possible<br />

severe consequences. In certain cases, frustrated FBI agents cited `direct pressure by the State<br />

Department,' and in other cases `sensitive diplomatic relations' is cited. The Department of Justice<br />

Inspector General received detailed and specific information and evidence regarding this issue<br />

THE SEPTEMBER <strong>11</strong> COMMISSION REPORT Page 65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!