06.05.2013 Views

September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“response” server. One server simulates buys, and the other simulates sells. It does<br />

not take a lot of effort to switch simulations from targeting test database servers to<br />

real-life production database servers. However, if the war game servers are<br />

simulating banks, none of the originating bank trade data ever gets copied to a<br />

disaster recovery server (test servers are not copied to disaster recovery sites), nor<br />

does it get found on an originating bank server. Hence, under a scenario like this, one<br />

half of the clearing and settlement data would be missing – which is exactly what<br />

caused and led to the US securities settlement problems in the weeks that followed<br />

the attack. (This situation is described at length further on in this Section.) At least<br />

two of the traders who knew how to run those programs were present and died in the<br />

attack.<br />

One of the many strange observations from the technology reviews of the events<br />

<strong>September</strong> <strong>11</strong> is that the government security trading system(s) never went down and<br />

trade data was never lost! Much is made on Convar’s observation that there was lost<br />

data of illegal trades, but subsequent reports suggest the data was never really lost!<br />

"All the data and software was mirrored to Rochelle Park," said Noviello, adding that the facility<br />

was established as a full-fledged data center, not just a recovery site, in February. Many Rochelle<br />

Park systems are primary, as well as backup… A triangular architecture, with points at the WTC,<br />

Rochelle Park and London connected by DS 3 pipes, worked exactly as planned. "When one<br />

corner went down, we never stopped trading," Kiewel said. "The system kept functioning in<br />

Europe and Asia." …said Noviello, adding, "we did not lose any data." [Cantor Fitzgerald - Forty-<br />

Seven Hours, Edward Cone, CIO Insight and Sean Gallagher, October 29, 2001, Copyright ©<br />

2004 Ziff Davis Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. Originally appearing in eWEEK]<br />

“With many key facilities for the fixed income markets located in or near the World Trade Center,<br />

the loss of communication services prevented market participants from interacting with one<br />

another and with clearing and settlement providers, such as the GSCC and the Bank of New York<br />

(BONY). Clearing and settlement of fixed income transactions in general was a major problem in<br />

the days and weeks after the attacks, especially since the bulk of government securities cash and<br />

repo trading occurs early in the day – meaning that significant amounts of data from the IDBs on<br />

almost a full day’s trading in this area was lost and had to be meticulously reconstructed. BONY,<br />

which was the clearing bank for many major market participants and maintained some ofGSCC’s<br />

settlement accounts, had to evacuate four facilities including its primary telecommunications data<br />

center and over 8,300 staff located near the WTC. BONY conducted processing activities as part<br />

of clearing and settlement of government securities transactions at several of these facilities.<br />

…The critical payment systems, such as Fedwire and CHIPS, continued to operate with minimal<br />

disruption on <strong>September</strong> <strong>11</strong>, 2001. While both Fedwire and CHIPS (as well as some of their<br />

customers/users) were affected by communications disruptions in the aftermath of the terrorist<br />

strikes, transactions could continue being processed because the actual processing facilities are<br />

not located in lower Manhattan. Retail payment systems, including check clearing and ACH<br />

transactions, also generally fared well following the attacks and continued to operate without<br />

significant disruptions. Some check clearing functions were delayed, however, due to the<br />

grounding of air transportation. The U.S. banking system as a whole continued to function<br />

relatively smoothly on and after <strong>September</strong> <strong>11</strong>, 2001.” [Survey and Analysis of Security Issues in<br />

the U.S. Banking and Finance Sector – <strong>September</strong> 2003 Institute for Security Technology Studies<br />

AT Dartmouth College , Copyright 2003]<br />

What a detailed review of the technology experts review of activities that day<br />

suggests is that the primary trading systems did not go down and data was not lost<br />

THE SEPTEMBER <strong>11</strong> COMMISSION REPORT Page 187

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!