September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

een authoritatively studied in economic and business journals, and at least commented
on in the media news. The event happened, but there is no reported news of it!)
There is nothing in his story to indicate that Vreeland is lying, and several clues in his
story which suggest it to be true. It also suggests there was another agent in US
intelligence that knew of the attack, and that Vreeland was sent to collect the evidence to
make sure it didn’t see the light of day. In doing so, his Canadian colleague in the
operation was ‘suicided’ shortly after Vreeland’s mission was completed.
The allegations of Vreeland’s fraud and misconduct which are being used to discredit
him are “well documented claims” but before the validity of Vreeland’s case is
discounted, the reader should bear in mind the example of U.S. Navy Captain Gunther
Russbacher. Russbacher is the Navy pilot who came forth and testified to Congress that
George Bush Sr. did indeed go to Paris as alleged in the October Surprise/Iran-Contra
plot.
“In 1968, he was assigned to the Office of Naval Intelligence with a permanent commission…. In
October 1980, he was command pilot for the aircraft used allegedly to fly George Bush to Paris.From
March to July 1982.… His group met with Mossad (Israeli intelligence) people in Alicante for the final
delivery of weapons to Iran. In March 1985, he was incarcerated at Segoville, TX for an escape from
federal conviction resulting from 1973 where he was caught with numerous bags of bearer bonds while
dressed as a U.S. Air Force major.” [Who Is this Man Who Claims He Flew Bush to Paris, Harry V.
Martin , Napa Sentinel, 1991 ]
Subsequent to their turning on the Bush presidents, both Vreeland and Russbacher found
themselves incarcerated for numerous crimes which they and their lawyers claimed were
trumped up fabrications. The point to be made is that Vreeland’s claims, if true, can only
be discounted by the U.S. Government if he is locked away and made to be a fraud, just
as was done with Russbacher. (It is of some note that the Canadian legal system finally
released Vreeland, suggesting the claims of fraud lacked credibility.) The coincidence
here is that this generally happens to anyone who turns on the Bush administration. This
pattern of “setting up” and eliminating whistleblowers by the Bush administration is more
thoroughly addressed, with more examples, such as LT Colonel Anthony Shaffer and
four star General Kevin Byrnes in Section 12 of this report.
Another loose cannon in Navy Intelligence turned out to be Navy Capt. Scott Phillpott, a
22 year active duty serviceman who stepped forward and brought the Able-Danger
Operation to light, after the 9/11 Commission ignored testimony from several individuals
of this group’s awareness of Mohammed Atta as a known terrorist operating in the US a
year before 9/11.
“Navy Capt. Scott J. Phillpott, a U.S. Naval Academy graduate who managed the program for the
Pentagon's Special Operations Command, confirmed "Atta was identified by Able Danger by January-
February of 2000."[An Incomplete Investigation: Why Did the 9/11 Commission Ignore `Able
Danger'?, Louis Freeh, Wall Street Journal., November 17, 2005]
THE SEPTEMBER 11 COMMISSION REPORT Page 204