September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

security video recording from the plane or Boston, or visual confirmation of the
man boarding or on board. His father said the security video picture of
“Mohammed Atta” at the Portland airport was not his son. This issue of identity
theft has plagued identification of many of the supposed 9/11 suspects. What the
world may have been presented is conveniently planted information which
suggests Mohammed Atta died.
The bag that has been produced as key evidence is troubling. Atta is the only
individual on the flight whose bag did not make the plane. He supposedly
checked two bags in Portland, so it seems fortuitously and coincidentally odd that
one bag was left behind. Two simultaneous coincidences seriously challenge
credibility.
There is the curious aspect of his last will and testament found in the bag
conveniently left behind. Foreign press describe the document as "a cross
between a chilling spiritual exhortation aimed at the hijackers and an operational
mission checklist." Much has been written about the will, but not in the following
context. Atta supposedly wrote it in 1996 and carried it with him for five years.
The world is expected to believe that after all this concern and care for his last
will and testament, he deliberately took the will with him, knowing it would be
destroyed, but it accidently was saved for posterity by poor baggage handling that
affected only this bag on this flight. This is a significant contradiction in behavior
that is best explained by a theory that the bag, and will, was planted as evidence,
by undiscovered co-conspirators. There might be an official counter to this theory
that the bag was a plant, by recognizing that “second copy was found in a car
parked outside Boston airport, allegedly rented by Atta.” This however, raises
equally disturbing questions which remain unanswered.
1. If Atta flew into Boston on the morning of September 11 as alleged, why did
he leave a rental car in the parking lot at the Boston airport – overnight -
where it could be discovered in advance, thus jeopardizing the entire
operation. Should both pieces of “evidence” (bag and car) be viewed as
plants, left by people who wanted the world to believe this was an Arabic,
terrorist attack?
2. The FBI- on the basis of security videos - is convinced that on September 4, a
white Mitsubishi sedan with Atta was seen “casing” the airport parking lot
several times within the space of a few days. On September 10, that car is left
at the airport by Atta, who then drives north to Portland, Maine, with another
hijacker, and flies back to the airport where he left the car. These would seem
to be the activities of an individual planning a get-away, more than anything
else. How does one explain the presence of this vehicle: plant or getaway car?
• The discovered bag also presents a troubling question. The bag supposedly did
not get loaded on the plane because it did not arrive within the necessary ten
minutes of departure, while the other one did. This means the flight from
Portland on which Atta is reported to have arrived, might have landed
exceptionally close to departure time of the connecting flight. Is the world
THE SEPTEMBER 11 COMMISSION REPORT Page 299