Free Download - HCCREMS

Recommendations

Info

HClNC Vegetation Classification & mapping Project: Volume 1: Vegetation Classification Technical Report Appendix 6: Collated review continued Outliers Action Final notes accepted Group undersampled Further notes No Location Site cleaning Check Split Merge Remove accepted Proposed name change Group Preliminary community name Group Detailed notes Group Y RBR01 reallocated to Group 108. This group is located mostly on footslopes whilst groups 67 and 69 are not. The group is located in the valley where it takes a bend – Travis Peake. It is a distinct group but not comfortable with it, but definitely does not belong to groups 67 and 69 – Travis Peake. The group might look better when the sites are cleaned up; RBR01 is one site that should be removed – Travis Peake. Pesky Mount arthur Complex! Sandstone influence peak in the middle Hunter floor is it real. I dunno but it always stands out – Daniel Connolly. N x Requires checking. Y ? at a minimum, remove Site HUNTeR / RBR01 (this is a vine thicket). 68 Large-fruited Grey Gum / Spotted Gum / Grey Box N Merge with Group 67 – Travis Peake. Y Merge Group 67 and Group 69. N x Merge with Group 67 – Travis Peake. 69 Narrow-leaved Ironbark / Offwhite Box / Bull Oak grassy N Sites reallocated according to nearest neighbours. N Remove, all next to roads and mines – Travis Peake. Lump – Daniel Connolly. N x Sites are located next to roads and mines – Travis Peake. 71 Narrow-leaved Ironbark / Grey Box 174 N Reallocated to Group 45 (which is merge of groups 45 and 46) based on nearest neighbours. N Site located on the southern side of Werekata (CSN57P6F), is on the edge of floodplain forest, it should be reallocated to a floodplain community group – Steve Bell. Northern site is on edge of floodplain, it is a Melauca swamp, ecotone community, this site can be reallocated – John Hunter. 74 No name N x Merge these two sites into another floodplain community group. Merge with Group 89; not particularly close statistically but is a Rough-barked apple community in the general geographic area. N Highly disturbed – Travis Peake. Combine with other Rough-barked apple groups – Travis Peake, Doug Binns. N x Merge with other Rough-barked apple groups – Travis Peake, Doug Binns. 79 Rough-barked apple grassy open forest in Turrell State Forest N Can’t do much with these; no time to redo cover scores and re-run. Y Cover codes are incorrect, once they are fixed the sites might merge into other groups – Doug Binns, all agreed. 80 No name N x Requires checking – cover scores are incorrect. N Can’t do much with these; no time to redo cover scores and re-run. 81 No name N x Requires checking. Y Cover scores are incorrect, when they are fixed they will merge into other groups – Doug Binns. Sites could merge in with groups located on the Merriwa plateau – Steve Lewer. This could be a community to recognise, possibly a sedgeland community (Carex inversa sedgeland community) – John Hunter.
Appendix 6: Collated review continued Outliers Action Final notes accepted Group undersampled Further notes No Location Site cleaning Check Split Merge Remove accepted Proposed name change Group Preliminary community name Group Y Difficult to justify merging Group 83 and Group 86 based on statistics but lets defer to the review panel thoughts and merge. Detailed notes Group N This is not a separate community – the species do not belong where the sites are located – Steve Lewer. This community could be merged into the groups below – Travis Peake, Steve Lewer. 83 White Box grassy woodland N x Merge with Group 86 – Steve Lewer & Travis Peake. Difficult to justify merging Group 83 and Group 86 based on statistics but lets defer to the review panel thoughts and merge. Groups 83 and 86 should be merged – Travis Peake, Steve Lewer. Mt George to Gloucester have a river oak – no North Coast community – please check – andrew Paget. N x (north coast community) N x Merge with Group 83 – Steve Lewer & Travis Peake. 86 Grey Box / White Box grassy woodland N Site QRBC4a6V reallocated; Site JH_ RT103 unallocated. N Most of these sites were disturbed – Doug Binns. This community might be an ecotone – andrew Paget. Put these sites into another community – all. 88 No name N x all agreed upon, reallocate sites. Merge with Group 89; not particularly close statistically but is a Rough-barked apple community in the general geographic area. N x Requires checking. N This group could be merged into another group – John Hunter. This group looks to be either disturbed or observer bias – Doug Binns. Need to check this one out. 91 Rough-barked apple moist sandstone gully forest 175 Y Merge Group 103 and Group 105 (Group 53 is also close to these statistically but is geographically separated). N White Box, Grey Box integrades in this area – Steve Lewer. N x Merge with Group 105 – Steve Lewer. 103 Silvertop Stringbark / Grey Box grassy open forest of the slopes of the Liverpool Range aPPeNDIx 6 Collated review Merge Group 103 and Group 105 (Group 53 is also close to these statistically but is geographically separated). N Groups 103 and 105 should be merged – Travis Peake, Steve Bell, Steve Lewer. N x Merge with Group 103 – Steve Lewer, Travis Peake, Steve Bell. 105 White Box shrub / grass open forest of the northern parts of the Upper Hunter Merge with Group 1; there are other groups closer but Group 1 makes more geographic sense. N Sites are very heterogenous – Doug Binns. John Hunter completed these sites and he said they were all very heavily cleared and grazed – John Hunter. Thus, group may relate to a group further east – need to check – all. N x Group may relate to a group further east. 107 E. biturbinata / Yellow Box / Tussock Snow Grass grassy open forest
Page 3:
Hunter, Central & Lower North Coast
Page 6 and 7:
Classification Expert Review Panel
Page 8 and 9:
3.4 Vegetation community analysis .
Page 10 and 11:
List of abbreviations API aerial ph
Page 12 and 13:
HClNC Vegetation Classification & m
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
CHaPter 2 Vegetation of the study a
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
CHaPTeR 3 Method of data collection
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
CHaPTeR 4 Results 4.1 Data audit an
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135: HClNC Vegetation Classification & m
Page 148 and 149: BIBLIOGRaPHY Anderson, R. H. (1961)
Page 182 and 183: Appendix 6: Collated review continu
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298:
show all

Free Download - HCCREMS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?