04.06.2013 Views

Free Download - HCCREMS

Free Download - HCCREMS

Free Download - HCCREMS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.3.3 Final classification scheme<br />

55<br />

CHaPTeR 4 Results<br />

The final classification scheme was developed based on the feedback from the review workshop<br />

and further analyses. A total of 4678 sites were allocated to 210 communities in the final<br />

classification scheme. During the revision, changes were made to the allocation of 855 sites. Of<br />

these 108 sites were removed from the final classification and the remaining were allocated to<br />

different groups (including a small number of previously unallocated sites). Of the 258 groups<br />

presented to the review panel 207 were retained in the final classification (in some cases with<br />

changes and/or merging with other groups) and three new groups were created either by<br />

splitting older groups or creating new groups from previously unallocated sites. In addition to<br />

these, 16 groups that were not represented within the scheme but were considered appropriate<br />

for conclusion were listed with the final classification. A number of these unrepresented<br />

communities were identified through the grasslands workshop (see below), while others<br />

were identified through the review process outlined above in section 3.4.7. Table 4.5 lists all<br />

final communities and indicates whether they were represented within the final classification<br />

scheme. A brief description of each community is given below in section 4.5.4. For convenience<br />

the descriptions have been grouped by Keith formations / subformations and within that have<br />

been retained in dendrogram order.<br />

Table 4.5. Overview of outcomes of the expert review of the classification scheme<br />

Statistics from vegetation classification review<br />

Groups requiring site cleaning (e.g. remove outliers)<br />

Number<br />

45<br />

Groups accepted by experts 161<br />

Groups requiring action Remove 5<br />

Merge 68<br />

Merge / split 7<br />

Split 3<br />

Checking 14<br />

Total requiring action 97<br />

Groups under-sampled 32<br />

Total number of groups classified 258<br />

4.3.4 Expert review of grasslands communities<br />

An expert review workshop was held to identify grassland communities known to exist<br />

within the study area. It should be noted that a small number of grassland communities were<br />

represented within the final classification scheme, however, given the general focus on woody<br />

vegetation in the majority of surveys compiled it was considered unlikely that these groups<br />

would provide a comprehensive list of grassland communities in the study area. The initial<br />

task for the workshop was to develop a working definition of native grassland communities to<br />

guide discussions. The following definition was developed during the workshop:<br />

grasslands<br />

➜ 50% of ground cover present is made up of grasses (i.e. members of Poaceae family)<br />

➜ Ground cover dominated by native perennial grasses

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!