Free Download - HCCREMS

Recommendations

Info

HClNC Vegetation Classification & mapping Project: Volume 1: Vegetation Classification Technical Report Appendix 6: Collated review continued Outliers Action Final notes accepted Group undersampled Further notes No Location Site cleaning Check Split Merge Remove accepted Proposed name change Group Preliminary community name Group Y Merge Group 160, Group 197, Group 198 and Group 199. N This related to Group 160 and Group 198 – Doug Binns. Need to look at Steve Griffith mapping – this could help to separate or merge them together. N x Merge with groups 160 and 198 – Doug Binns. Melaleuca sieberi / Lepyrodia scariosa heathy woodland of coastal lowlands 197 Melaleuca sieberi / Lepyrodia sieberi heathy woodland of coastal lowlands Detailed notes Group N Groups 160 and 198 are they similar? – David Tierney. Merge Group 160, Group 197, Group 198 and Group 199. N x Merge with groups 160 and 197 – David Tierney. 198 Melaleuca sieberi / Tall Sawsedge / Matted Twig-rush wet shrubland / swamp forest Does not have Xanthorrhoea; merge Group 160, Group 197, Group 198 and Group 199. N Could be merged with Group 204, if this group has Xanthorrhoea – Steve Bell. Check full species list. N x Merge with Group 204 – Steve Bell. 199 Leptocarpus tenax / Lepyrodia scariosa sedgelands of the Central Coast N Not statistically close to Group 199; close to Group 216 at group level but not nearest neighbours; very localised; leave unallocated. N x This also could occur up at Lake Innes and Crowdy. Need more sampling – andrew Paget. N x Merge with Group 199 – Steve Bell. 204 Sword Sedge / Melaleuca thymifolia / grass tree sedgeland of the Central Coast 180 Y Southern outliers reallocated to Group 215. N Steve Griffith – stated that there could have been a bit of lumping of his work. He has given Michael notes and a reference to refer to. N x x Groups could be further split – check Steve Griffith’s work. Merge with Group 214 – Robert Payne. 213 Broad-leaved Paperbark / Swamp Mahogany / Swamp Oak / Saw Sedge swamp forest Y Don’t merge. N Could be merged with Group 213 – Robert Payne, Daniel Connolly. Could be merged with Group 219 – andrew Paget. The differences relate to the soil landscapes – Steve Griffith, look at Steve Griffith’s work. Be careful when lumping back. Steve Griffith suggested that they might be separate groups. N x Merge with groups 219 and 213 – andrew Paget. It is not restricted to the Central Coast – Steve Griffith. 214 Broad-leaved Paperbark / Saw Sedge swamp forest of coastal lowlands N Y Merge Group 215 and Group 216; northern sites reallocated to Group 213. N x Merge with Group 216 – Robert Payne. 215 Swamp Mahogany / M. linariifolia swamp forest of coastal lowlands Merge Group 215 and Group 216. N Group 216 can be grouped with Group 215 – Robert Payne. Is this one observer? Lump with Group 215 – Daniel Connolly. N x Merge with Group 215 – Robert Payne. 216 Swamp Mahogany / Melaleuca linearifolia / Water Couch swamp forest of the Central Coast
Appendix 6: Collated review continued Outliers Action Final notes accepted Group undersampled Further notes No Location Site cleaning Check Split Merge Remove accepted Proposed name change Group Preliminary community name Group Detailed notes Group Y Don’t merge. N Could be merged with groups 213 and 214 but before lumping back check the soil landscape mapping as you will find that they exist on different substrates. N x Merge with groups 214 and 213 – andrew Paget. 219 Swamp Mahogany / Swamp Water Fern / Plume Rush swamp forest Y N x Requires checking. N This extends right along the North Coast – Steve Griffith. They could be split into two different groups based on the grass type – Steve Griffith (check Steve’s comments and mapping). Could be an ecotone – John Hunter. Robert Payne – believes that it should be kept as one group, might be difficult to map. 223 Water Couch / Spike rush freshwater wetland of the Central Coast and Lower Hunter N Okay – Daniel Connolly. Y Statistically it makes more sense to merge Group 225, Group 226 and Group 227 into one large Smooth-barked apple group (called Group 225) and keep Group 34 separate as a small nearcoastal group. N x Merge with Group 227 – Robert Payne, Steve Bell. 225 Smooth-barked apple / Red Bloodwood / Kangaroo Grass shrub / grass open forest of the Central Coast 181 227 Smooth-barked apple / Kangaroo Grass / Wiry Panic shrub / grass open forest of the Central Coast foothills aPPeNDIx 6 Collated review Statistically it makes more sense to merge groups 225, 226 and 227 into one large Smooth-barked apple group (called Group 225) and keep Group 34 separate as a small near-coastal group. Outlier PTY03N7M left unallocated. This group is very similar to Group 225, however, if they are quite floristically distinct then they should remain as two groups – Robert Payne & Steve Bell. There is a couple of outliers, especially the one to the west; merge with Group 226 – Daniel Connolly. Y 2 West of main distribution N x Merge with Group 225 – Robert Payne, Steve Bell. Merge with Group 226 – Daniel Connolly. Y Merge groups 233, 280 and 281. N There seems to be a lot of sparsiofolia groups – these groups may need to be checked to see if they could be merged together – Steve Bell; will check these sites but they are very species poor from memory. N x Merge with other E. sparsifolia groups – Steve Bell. 233 E. sparsifolia / Large-fruited Grey Gum shrubby open forest of northern Wollemi NP
Page 3:
Hunter, Central & Lower North Coast
Page 6 and 7:
Classification Expert Review Panel
Page 8 and 9:
3.4 Vegetation community analysis .
Page 10 and 11:
List of abbreviations API aerial ph
Page 12 and 13:
HClNC Vegetation Classification & m
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
CHaPter 2 Vegetation of the study a
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
CHaPTeR 3 Method of data collection
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
CHaPTeR 4 Results 4.1 Data audit an
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141: HClNC Vegetation Classification & m
Page 148 and 149: BIBLIOGRaPHY Anderson, R. H. (1961)
Page 182 and 183: Appendix 6: Collated review continu
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298:
show all

Free Download - HCCREMS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?