Free Download - HCCREMS

Recommendations

Info

HClNC Vegetation Classification & mapping Project: Volume 1: Vegetation Classification Technical Report Appendix 6: Collated review continued Outliers Action Final notes accepted Group undersampled Further notes No Location Site cleaning Check Split Merge Remove accepted Proposed name change Group Preliminary community name Group Y Detailed notes Group Y N This group came out as a distinct group in Steve Bell classification work – Steve Bell; possible but highly localised and not grouping with similar communities. Has Munmorah and Pinney data that adds to concern. 13 Spotted Gum / Grey Ironbark dry open forest Central Coast and Lower Hunter Y Y N These are all Steve Bell sites on reserve. Community exists but probably should group with Group 14 (or good sites within Group 14) – Daniel Connolly. 15 Spotted Gum moist shrubby open forest Y Y 2 ? There is a couple of outliers. Y Outliers reallocated or unallocated. 16 Forest Oak / Smooth-barked apple / Blackbutt open forest Y N No further comments. Y 17 Tallowwood / Smooth-barked apple / Forest Oak shrub / grass open forest 19 Cladium procerum wetland Y N Steve Griffith – definitely a distinct group. Y Y N Group is distinctive – andrew Paget. Y 20 Blue Mountains ash shrubby open forest on rocky slopes Y Y N This group looks not right – andrew Paget. Group is a distinct group – Steve Griffith (Steve’s opinion accepted). 21 Pink Bloodwood / Red Mahogany / Acacia leiocalyx 186 Y Y N New Yengo data will clarify this group if you want to split gullies and sheltered slopes of Hunter range – Daniel Connolly. 22 Large-fruited Grey Gum / Mountain Blue Gum / Forest Oak Y N No further comments. Y 23 Large-fruited Grey Gum / Smooth-barked apple / Blueleaved Stringybark semi-mesic shrub / grass Y Y N always troubled by this data. Single observer, localised. It’s a community but no relationship with similar to west and east – Daniel Connolly. 24 Rough-barked apple / Forest Oak herb / grass open forest Y Outliers reallocated. Two outliers – sites GSP1Da7V aLLWOLL and csn15b3m ReMSCe. These outliers might belong to Group 128. There is a lot of Turpentine on the CC and groups may be distinguised by understorey – David Tierney. This a regional scheme – Doug Binns. If you want a local scheme you will need to do the analysis again; yes the community makes sense broadly but I suspect that some of the sites in sheltered positions west of the Hunter range are hinterland forests rather than coastal escarpment forests – Daniel Connolly. Y Y 2 Outliers could belong to Group 128. Turpentine is not conspicous – the Red gum is the main component of this group – Robert Payne. 26 Turpentine / Forest Oak moist shrubby open forest
Appendix 6: Collated review continued Outliers Action Final notes accepted Group undersampled Further notes No Location Site cleaning Check Split Merge Remove accepted Proposed name change Group Preliminary community name Group Y Outlier reallocated to Group 36. Check out the Goulburn River site it could be an outlier – MMS GOULRIV. This group is floristically distinct from a similar group Y Y 1 Goulburn River site – Travis Peake. Detailed notes Group 28 River Oak / Grey Myrtle riparian Upper Hunter River Oak? located in the south of the study area – Travis Peake. Y N x Thought this group would be more widespread – Steve Y Bell. Definitely not observer bias as it has been surveyed by different surveyors – Travis Peake. Should keep this as a separate group – Travis Peake. Y N No further comments. Y 29 Large-fruited Grey Gum / Grey Myrtle / E. sparsifolia / Rusty Fig 30 Rusty Fig / Alectryon subcinereus dry rainforest of the Central Hunter Valley Y Some sites re-unallocated. x This group is spread across different environments – Steve Bell. The sites down on the valley floor should not be located there. These sites could be merged into the Valley Floor Box group – Steve Bell. No sites located in the Greater Taree area, however, it Y Y ? Sites on valley floor could be merged into Valley Floor Box group. 32 Large-fruited Grey Gum / Grey Box exists there as an ecotone – andrew Paget. Y Outlier (CRB89) reallocated to Group 1. Site up in the Ne of the distribution at Greta – this could be an outlier. Sites on sandstone country represent this community – Travis Peake. Ferny moist herbaceous basalts and alluvium couple of Y Y 1 Site Ne of main distribution (Greta) – Travis Peake. 33 Grey Myrtle / Mountain Blue Gum ferny gully forest 187 odd easterly sites in this group – Daniel Connolly. Y Wollemi sites reallocated; southern sites not reallocated. Possibly two outliers in the very south of the study area – David Tierney. another outlier in the north on the valley floor – Travis Peake. There is a northern Wollemi community that they might relate to – Doug Binns. alluvial moist; check ouliers – Daniel Connolly. 35 Lilly Pilly marginal warm temperate of the Central Coast and Lower Hunter Valley aPPeNDIx 6 Collated review Y Y 3 Sites in the very south of the study area – David Tierney. Site in the north on the valley floor – Travis Peake. Y N No further comments. Y 36 Grey Myrtle dry rainforest of sheltered sandstone gullies in northern Wollemi NP Y eastern sites un / reallocated. There are sites in the east that might not belong to this community as they will be influenced by coastal climatic factors. These sites should be reallocated – Travis Peake. any groups with Backhousia in it will be difficult to Y Y ? Sites located in the east – Travis Peake. Grey Myrtle / Largefruited Grey Gum gully rainforest 37 Grey Myrtle / Large-fruited Grey gully rainforest classify – Steve Bell. Y N No further comments. Y 42 Large-fruited Grey Gum / Roughbarked apple open forest
Page 3:
Hunter, Central & Lower North Coast
Page 6 and 7:
Classification Expert Review Panel
Page 8 and 9:
3.4 Vegetation community analysis .
Page 10 and 11:
List of abbreviations API aerial ph
Page 12 and 13:
HClNC Vegetation Classification & m
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
CHaPter 2 Vegetation of the study a
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
CHaPTeR 3 Method of data collection
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
CHaPTeR 4 Results 4.1 Data audit an
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147: HClNC Vegetation Classification & m
Page 148 and 149: BIBLIOGRaPHY Anderson, R. H. (1961)
Page 182 and 183: Appendix 6: Collated review continu
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298:
show all

Free Download - HCCREMS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?