06.06.2013 Views

Donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine for ...

Donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine for ...

Donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ADAS-cog of –1.7 (SEM 0.45) <strong>and</strong> those in the<br />

placebo group (n = 55) a mean change in<br />

ADAS-cog of 0.6 (SEM 0.57). The study<br />

demonstrated a statistically significant difference,<br />

p = 0.001. The mean mADAS-cog at baseline<br />

was 23.8 (SEM 0.85) in the donepezil group <strong>and</strong><br />

24.1 (SEM 0.93) in the placebo group.<br />

Cognitive responders on ADAS-cog<br />

One study reported data on ‘cognitive<br />

responders’. 51 Cognitive responders were defined<br />

as those with at least a 4-point improvement on<br />

the ADAS-cog; they also presented data on those<br />

with at least a 7-point improvement. In this study<br />

37.8% of participants given 5 mg donepezil <strong>and</strong><br />

53.5% of participants given 10 mg donepezil had<br />

at least a 4-point improvement. These compare<br />

with 26.8% of those participants given the placebo<br />

intervention. Participants with at least a 7-point<br />

improvement on ADAS-cog were 15.4 <strong>and</strong> 25.2%<br />

in the two donepezil groups (5 <strong>and</strong> 10 mg/day,<br />

respectively) compared with 7.8% in the placebo<br />

group. The trial also reports that the percentage<br />

of participants with poorer ADAS-cog scores from<br />

baseline were 20.3% in the 5 mg donepezil group,<br />

18.9% in the 10 mg donepezil group <strong>and</strong> 42.3%<br />

in the placebo group, hence cognitive worsening<br />

was higher in those treated with placebo. No<br />

statistical analyses were undertaken to compare<br />

differences in any of the groups’ responses on<br />

these outcomes.<br />

MMSE<br />

Nine included trials report the MMSE <strong>and</strong> results<br />

are given in Table 6. On the MMSE a positive<br />

mean change indicates a clinical improvement.<br />

Six trials were two-arm comparisons, two were<br />

three-arm trials <strong>and</strong> one was a four-arm trial.<br />

Change from baseline score <strong>for</strong> each trial is given<br />

in Table 6. The summary that follows will<br />

predominantly discuss comparisons between 5 mg<br />

donepezil <strong>and</strong> placebo <strong>and</strong> 10 mg donepezil <strong>and</strong><br />

placebo, regardless of the number of arms in the<br />

individual trial. The two studies 41,47 where the<br />

intervention dose of donepezil was 5 mg/day <strong>for</strong><br />

28 days followed by 10 mg/day until study<br />

completion will be treated as having a 10 mg/day<br />

dose. The one trial where participants received<br />

either 5 or 10 mg donepezil is reported separately.<br />

The one trial that had 12 weeks of open-label<br />

treatment prior to r<strong>and</strong>omisation is also reported<br />

separately. 49<br />

<strong>Donepezil</strong> 5 mg/day versus placebo. Three trials<br />

included an intervention group with a daily dose<br />

of 5 mg donepezil. The mean change from<br />

© Queen’s Printer <strong>and</strong> Controller of HMSO 2006. All rights reserved.<br />

Health Technology Assessment 2006; Vol. 10: No. 1<br />

baseline MMSE was between 0.24 <strong>and</strong> 2.0 <strong>for</strong> the<br />

donepezil group <strong>and</strong> between –0.97 <strong>and</strong> 1.2 <strong>for</strong><br />

the placebo groups. The mean treatment<br />

difference in change from baseline scores between<br />

donepezil <strong>and</strong> placebo was ~1 point. Overall, all<br />

studies demonstrated improvement in MMSE in<br />

the donepezil groups compared with the placebo<br />

groups, although these differences reached<br />

statistical significance in only two. 51,52 Some of the<br />

variation between trials may be due to sample size<br />

as the one trial that did not reach statistical<br />

significance had small sample sizes. There may<br />

also be differences attributed to the properties of<br />

the scale (see discussion in Chapter 10).<br />

Two of the three studies provided data (mean<br />

change <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation) that allowed them<br />

to be combined in a meta-analysis (Figure 3).<br />

Pooling the data using a fixed-effects model<br />

showed an overall improvement in MMSE with<br />

5 mg/day donepezil compared with placebo [WMD<br />

1.08 (95% CI: 0.57 to 1.58)]. Heterogeneity was<br />

not statistically significant, p = 0.63. No difference<br />

was noted using a r<strong>and</strong>om-effects model.<br />

<strong>Donepezil</strong> 10 mg/day versus placebo. Six trials<br />

included an intervention group with a daily dose of<br />

10 mg donepezil. The mean change from baseline<br />

MMSE was between –0.46 <strong>and</strong> 1.7 <strong>for</strong> the<br />

donepezil group <strong>and</strong> between –2.18 <strong>and</strong> 0.5 <strong>for</strong> the<br />

placebo groups. This variation may in part be<br />

explained by differences in the study duration, with<br />

longer duration reducing the mean change MMSE<br />

score from baseline. Baseline MMSE scores were<br />

generally similar between these trials. The mean<br />

treatment difference in change from baseline scores<br />

between donepezil <strong>and</strong> placebo was ~1.5 points.<br />

Overall, all studies demonstrated statistically<br />

significant improvement in MMSE in the donepezil<br />

groups compared with the placebo groups.<br />

Two of the six studies provided data (mean change<br />

<strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation) that allowed them to be<br />

combined in a meta-analysis (Figure 4). Pooling the<br />

data using a fixed-effect model showed an overall<br />

improvement in MMSE with 10 mg/day donepezil<br />

compared with placebo [WMD 1.30 (95% CI: 0.78<br />

to 1.82)]. Heterogeneity was not statistically<br />

significant, p = 0.85. No difference was noted<br />

using a r<strong>and</strong>om-effects model.<br />

In one study, the dose of donepezil was 5 or<br />

10 mg/day, with approximately half receiving each<br />

dose. 43 The reported MMSE change from baseline<br />

in the donepezil-treated group at 60 weeks was<br />

–1.5. The reported MMSE change from baseline<br />

in the placebo group at 60 weeks was –1.75.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!