06.06.2013 Views

Donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine for ...

Donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine for ...

Donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22<br />

Clinical effectiveness<br />

TABLE 6 MMSE <strong>for</strong> donepezil<br />

AD2000 2004 43 Change from baseline Numbers estimated from figure<br />

<strong>Donepezil</strong> 5 mg/day or 10 mg/day<br />

(n = 154)<br />

Placebo (n = 160) p-Value versus placebo<br />

–1.5 –1.75 Not reported a<br />

Gauthier et al., 2002 41 St<strong>and</strong>ardised MMSE least-squares mean change from baseline Numbers estimated from<br />

figure<br />

<strong>Donepezil</strong> 10 mg/day (n = 91) Placebo (n = 100) p-Value versus placebo<br />

1.5 –0.56 0.0002<br />

Holmes et al., 200449 Mean change from baseline ± SEM<br />

<strong>Donepezil</strong> 10 mg/day (n = 41) Placebo (n = 55) p-Value versus placebo<br />

–0.1 (0.6) –1.8 (0.5) p = 0.02<br />

Mohs et al., 200146 Adjusted mean change from baseline Numbers estimated from figure<br />

<strong>Donepezil</strong> 10 mg/day (n = 207) Placebo (n = 208) p-Value versus placebo<br />

0.6 (n = 207) –0.6 (n = 208) p < 0.001<br />

Nunez et al., 200348 Least-squares mean change from baseline Numbers estimated from figure<br />

<strong>Donepezil</strong> 10 mg/day (n = 99) Placebo (n = 103) p-Value versus placebo<br />

1.7 0.5 p < 0.05<br />

Winblad et al., 200147 Wimo et al., 2003 56 Least-squares mean change from baseline ± SE Numbers estimated<br />

from figure<br />

<strong>Donepezil</strong> 10 mg/day (n = 142) Placebo (n = 144) p-Value versus placebo<br />

–0.46 ± 0.34 (n = 135) –2.18 ± 0.29 (n = 137) p < 0.001<br />

Rogers et al., 199851 Mean change from baseline ± SE<br />

1. <strong>Donepezil</strong> 5 mg/day 2. <strong>Donepezil</strong> 10 mg/day 3. Placebo (n = 154) p-Value versus placebo<br />

(n = 153) (n = 150)<br />

0.24 ± 0.29 0.39 ± 0.29 –0.97 ± 0.28 1. p = 0.0007<br />

2. p = 0.0002<br />

Rogers et al., 199852 Least-squares mean change from baseline ± SEM<br />

1. <strong>Donepezil</strong> 5 mg/day 2. <strong>Donepezil</strong> 10 mg/day 3. Placebo (n = 150) p-Value versus placebo<br />

(n = 156 ) (n = 156)<br />

1.0 ± 0.25 1.3 ± 0.24 0.04 ± 0.25 1. p < 0.004<br />

2. p < 0.001<br />

Rogers et al., 199653 Adjusted mean (min., max.) change from baseline<br />

1. <strong>Donepezil</strong> 2. <strong>Donepezil</strong> 3. <strong>Donepezil</strong> 4. Placebo p-Value versus placebo<br />

1 mg/day 3 mg/day 5 mg/day (n = 40)<br />

(n = 42) (n = 40) (n = 39)<br />

0.6 (–4.0, 7.0) 0.9 (–7.0, 5.0) 2.0 (–1.0, 7.0)<br />

p < 0.05 relative to 1 mg<br />

1.2 (–6.0, 8.0) Not reported<br />

Rogers et al., 199653 Mean change from baseline Numbers estimated from figure<br />

1. <strong>Donepezil</strong> 2. <strong>Donepezil</strong> 3. <strong>Donepezil</strong> 4. Placebo p-Value versus placebo<br />

1 mg/day 3 mg/day 5 mg/day (n = 40)<br />

(n = 42) (n = 40) (n = 39)<br />

0.66 0.80 2.00 1.37 Not reported<br />

a p-Values were reported <strong>for</strong> the overall treatment effect (p < 0.0001) rather than <strong>for</strong> the difference between groups at this<br />

particular time point (60 weeks).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!