06.06.2013 Views

Donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine for ...

Donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine for ...

Donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TABLE 32 Withdrawals due to adverse events <strong>for</strong> <strong>galantamine</strong><br />

[Commercial/academic confidential in<strong>for</strong>mation removed]<br />

Raskind et al. 61<br />

were higher among <strong>galantamine</strong> participants<br />

[range: 6% (8 mg/day)–44% (36 mg/day)] than<br />

placebo (range 5–9%) (see Table 32).<br />

Three trials 61,63,64 demonstrated differential<br />

dropout rates between groups <strong>for</strong> reasons other<br />

than adverse events. However, the pattern of the<br />

proportion withdrawing was not consistent; in two<br />

included trials the dropout rate was greater in the<br />

treatment arms but in another study dropout rate<br />

was greater in the placebo arm. In three published<br />

trials [commercial/academic confidential<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation removed] there appeared to be no<br />

difference between groups. No statistical analyses<br />

were undertaken by the trials. Very few deaths<br />

were reported in any of the included studies. Data<br />

relating to withdrawals <strong>and</strong> deaths <strong>for</strong> the<br />

individual trials can be found in Appendix 9.<br />

Summary<br />

● Six published multicentre placebo-controlled<br />

RCTs assessing doses ranging from 8 to<br />

36 mg/day of <strong>galantamine</strong> over durations of<br />

3–6 months met the inclusion criteria <strong>for</strong> the<br />

systematic review. The methodological quality<br />

<strong>and</strong> the quality of reporting in the studies were<br />

variable. Of the six RCTs, three appeared to<br />

limit selection bias, 62,64,65 three provided<br />

adequate in<strong>for</strong>mation to reduce the likelihood<br />

of measurement bias 61,63,65 <strong>and</strong> one appeared to<br />

guard against the effects of attrition bias. 64 Five<br />

RCTs reported that they were sponsored by the<br />

manufacturers.<br />

© Queen’s Printer <strong>and</strong> Controller of HMSO 2006. All rights reserved.<br />

Health Technology Assessment 2006; Vol. 10: No. 1<br />

Galantamine 24 mg/day (n = 212) Galantamine 32 mg/day (n = 211) Placebo (n = 213)<br />

49/212 (23%) 67/211 (32%) 16/213 (8%)<br />

Wilcock et al. 64<br />

Galantamine 24 mg/day (n = 220) Galantamine 32 mg/day (n = 218) Placebo (n = 215)<br />

31/220 (14%) 48/218 (22%) 19/215 (9%)<br />

Tariot et al. 63<br />

Galantamine Galantamine Galantamine Placebo (n = 286)<br />

8 mg/day (n = 140) 16 mg/day (n = 279) 24 mg/day (n = 273)<br />

9 19 27 20<br />

Wilkinson <strong>and</strong> Murray65 Galantamine Galantamine Galantamine Placebo (n = 87)<br />

18 mg/day (n = 88) 24 mg/day (n = 56) 36 mg/day (n = 54)<br />

19 (21.6%) 10 (17.9%) 24 (44.4%) 8 (9.2%)<br />

● [Commercial/academic confidential<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation removed]<br />

● Six published RCTs showed that <strong>galantamine</strong><br />

appears to confer a statistically significant<br />

benefit to participants on the ADAS-cog scale<br />

when compared with placebo, whether reducing<br />

the deterioration or leading to some<br />

improvement in their condition. The benefit<br />

varies depending on the dose of <strong>galantamine</strong>.<br />

The <strong>galantamine</strong>–placebo differences in ADAScog<br />

<strong>for</strong> 8 mg/day was 1.3 points, 16 mg/day<br />

3.1 points, 18 mg/day 1.7 points, 16 or<br />

24 mg/day 2.5 to 2.8 points, 24–32 mg/day<br />

1.7–3.4 points <strong>and</strong> 36 mg/day 2.3 points.<br />

[Commercial/academic confidential<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation removed] In addition, 14–17%<br />

more of <strong>galantamine</strong> participants were classified<br />

as responders (improving by ≥ 4 points on the<br />

ADAS-cog) than those on placebo.<br />

● Five published [commercial/academic<br />

confidential in<strong>for</strong>mation removed] RCTs<br />

assessed the effect of <strong>galantamine</strong> compared<br />

with placebo on the CIBIC-plus, individually<br />

showing that higher proportions of participants<br />

receiving <strong>galantamine</strong> experience improvement<br />

in their condition compared with those on<br />

placebo (0–6.5% more participants). In contrast,<br />

a higher proportion of placebo participants<br />

tend to deteriorate (4–18% more participants).<br />

Also, a higher proportion of <strong>galantamine</strong><br />

compared with placebo participants were<br />

considered to be responders to treatment with<br />

differences of between 4% (8 mg/day) <strong>and</strong> 17%<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!