Christiaan Huygens – A family affair - Proeven van Vroeger
Christiaan Huygens – A family affair - Proeven van Vroeger
Christiaan Huygens – A family affair - Proeven van Vroeger
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
diplomatic interlocutors, and Chapelain kept close track of Constantijn Sr.’s position at the<br />
court and in the negotiations. 402 Chapelain expressed his servitude to both men and his great<br />
appreciation for Constantijn Sr.’s status at several points, showing great interest in a good<br />
relationship with the whole <strong>family</strong> <strong>Huygens</strong>. There is a good case to make that Chapelain<br />
discussed <strong>Christiaan</strong> Jr.’s inclusion on the list with Constantijn Sr. during one of their<br />
assemblies. 403<br />
The next year, <strong>Christiaan</strong> Jr. received the same honor again: “[y]ou will again, without<br />
doubt, be excited by the new token of the continuation of his [His Majesty the King of France]<br />
esteem that you will receive soon (…).” 404<br />
ii. Moving closer <strong>–</strong> the King’s privilege for the pendulum clock<br />
In 1665, however, Colbert’s (and thus the King’s) patronage of <strong>Christiaan</strong> Jr. was<br />
taken to a new level. On March 6, 1665 <strong>Christiaan</strong> Jr. wrote to Moray:<br />
My Father notifies me that, at his latest audience, he has demanded the Privilege [for the<br />
remontoir pendulum clock] from the King, who has accorded it quickly enough, and if he<br />
[Constantijn Sr.] is not forced to leave too early I hope that he will be accelerating the<br />
certificate there. 405<br />
<strong>Christiaan</strong> obtained a privilege for his pendulum clock on sea, after years of technical<br />
preparation and strategic planning, granted by the King of France.<br />
Recompenses for tactical investment in patronage-ties typically yielded “privileges” for<br />
inventors and authors. Though “procedures and conditions for the granting of privileges to<br />
402 Ibid., Vol. III, No. 912 <strong>–</strong> Chapelain to <strong>Christiaan</strong> (Oct. 23, 1661): Chapelain told <strong>Christiaan</strong> that his<br />
father was invited to come for talks on the principality of Orange. HUYGENS, C. (1888) OC., Vol. IV,<br />
No 967 (Feb. 8, 1662): <strong>Christiaan</strong>’s comment in February 1662 that his father was treated “honorably at<br />
that court there [Versailles]” was echoed by Chapelain later that year, who indicated that his father<br />
came up to his good reputation and that his dignity grew more and more: <strong>Christiaan</strong> to Lodewijk (Feb.<br />
8, 1662), No 982 <strong>–</strong> Chapelain to <strong>Christiaan</strong> (Feb. 17, 1662)<br />
403 Oeuvres, Vol. IV, No, 1024 (15 Jun. 1662)<strong>–</strong> Constantijn Jr. & Sr. seem to have been regular visitors<br />
of Chapelain. HUYGENS, C. (1888) OC., No 875, Chapelain to <strong>Christiaan</strong> (Jul. 20, 1661) and<br />
HUYGENS, C. (1888) OC., No 912, Chapelain to <strong>Christiaan</strong> (Oct. 23, 1661). HUYGENS, C. (1888)<br />
OC., Vol. IV, No. 1152 (Oct. 5, 1663): Chapelain offered his services to Constantijn Sr.<br />
404 “Vous y serés sans doute excité de nouueau par la nouuelle marque que vous receurés bientost de la<br />
continuation de son estime.” HUYGENS, C. (1888) OC., Vol. V, No. 1241 (Jul. 12, 1664)<br />
405 “Mon Pere me mande qu’il a demandè a sa derniere audience le Privilege au Roy, qui l’avait accordè<br />
aussi tost, et s’il n’est contraint trop tost a partir j’espere qu’il en sera expedier la depesche.” Ibid., Vol.<br />
V, No. 1345 (March 6, 1665)<br />
114