10.06.2013 Views

Ifda dossier 47, May/June 1985

Ifda dossier 47, May/June 1985

Ifda dossier 47, May/June 1985

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Zakia Belhachmi<br />

EDUCATING WOMEN FOR DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF MOROCCO<br />

1, THE ARAB MUSLIM CONTEXT<br />

The Arab Muslim context, while having many of the generic<br />

characterisics of other Third World nations, has at the same<br />

time specific cultural idiosyncrasies that determine the<br />

particular conditions of women and the related problems of<br />

development. In order to grasp the meaning of such specific<br />

cultural characteristics, one has to place the Arab Muslim<br />

countries in their particular historical contexts and exam-<br />

ine them in the light of their own process of social change.<br />

Significantly, the social change of Arab Muslim countries<br />

has been subjected to Western values during colonial times<br />

as well as to Western theories of modernization. These theo-<br />

ries suffer from limited perspective deriving from its par-<br />

ticular temporal and social origin that generated simplistic<br />

and definite concepts about modernization, tradition and<br />

development.<br />

Instead of conceiving modernization and tradition as essen-<br />

tially asymmetrical concepts, most Western social scientists<br />

set forth an ideal model of modernization and labeled every-<br />

thing different as traditional. Yet, tradition is not only<br />

too heterogeneous and evocative to be of much use as an ana-<br />

lytical concept, but it is also diverse in values and struc-<br />

ture. To view tradition as "static" and the concepts of mo-<br />

dernization and tradition as being necessarily conflicting<br />

is erroneous.<br />

In fact, the concept of modernization sustains several ambi-<br />

guities which stem from the tendency to identify and associ-<br />

ate modernization with virtue. This failure in conception is<br />

due particularly to the failure to distinguish between what<br />

is modern and what is Western. Implicitly, the two are assu-<br />

med to be identical. Nevertheless, to a non-Western society,<br />

the process of modernization and Westernization are two dif-<br />

ferent matters altogether.<br />

In such a perspective, a modern society can be both modern<br />

and traditional because modernization and tradition are not<br />

"mutually exclusive" I/ concepts. The attitudes and beha-<br />

vioral patterns of people, in turn, may in some cases be<br />

fused; in others they may comfortably coexist, despite the<br />

apparent incongruity of it all. Accordingly, the cultural,<br />

psychological and behavioral continuities existing within a<br />

society through both its traditional and modern phases may<br />

- l/ Reinhard Bendiz, "Tradition and Modernity Reconsidered", Comparative<br />

Studies in Society and History, (Vol. XV, April 1967) p. 3.<br />

3 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!