15.06.2013 Views

download pdf

download pdf

download pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

135<br />

antenna? originating close together from the front, hasal joint large, sub-quadran-<br />

gular in form, inner corner somewhat more projecting than the outer, flagellum<br />

not much elongated. Inferior antennae exceeding the body in length. Mandibles<br />

very massive, with an oblique crest outside, cutting edge undivided, molar ex-<br />

pansion narrow, tipped with scattered spines, palp distinct, though<br />

rather feeble.<br />

Maxillipeds with the 2nd joint of the palp very large and expanded, antepenulti-<br />

mate joint rounded at the inner corner, penultimate joint very slightly produced<br />

at the end inside, epignath exceedingly large. 1st pair of legs comparatively small,<br />

simple; 2nd pair considerably larger and densely edged with spines, dactylus long<br />

and slender. The 2 succeeding pairs of legs slender and elongated,<br />

with the<br />

ischial joint considerably exceeding in length both the preceding and succeeding<br />

joints, carpal and prop'odal joints slender, linear, and each having at the end out-<br />

side, a very fully developed auditory seta, dactylus long and slender. The 2<br />

anterior pairs of natatory legs of similar structure, with the carpal joint exceed-<br />

ingly large and expanded, cordiform in outline, propodal joint much narrower,<br />

oblong, dactylus well developed; last pair much narrower than the 2 preceding<br />

pairs, with the carpal joint but slightly expanded, propodal joint linear, dactylus<br />

much elongated. Female operculum narrow, carinated along the middle, and densely<br />

setous at the edges; male operculum transformed in the usual manner. Uropoda<br />

comparatively small, Inarticulate, proximal joint lanielliform and edged<br />

ated setae, distal joint very small.<br />

with cili-<br />

Remarks. This genus was established by the present author as early as<br />

in the year 1863; but the generic name Mesostenus proposed at that time being<br />

already appropriated, it was subsequently changed to Ilyarachna. The genus is easily<br />

distinguishable from that of Muitnopsis, both as regards its outward appearance,<br />

and the structure of the several appendages. On a closer anatomical examination<br />

of the several species previously referred to this genus, I have found it necessary<br />

to separate some of them as types of distinct, though nearly-allied genera. In<br />

the restriction here adopted, it comprises 3 Norwegian species, to be described<br />

below. Moreover, 2 exotic species have been recorded as belonging to this genus,<br />

viz., I. quadrispmosa Beddard from the Challenger Expedition, and /. polita<br />

Bonnier from the Gulf of Gascogne. Of these, the last-named is unquestionably<br />

a true Ilyarachna, whereas the Challenger species seems to differ rather markedly,<br />

and should therefore more properly be regarded as the type of a separate genus.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!