15.06.2013 Views

download pdf

download pdf

download pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

220<br />

tary appearance, in the present form it was well developed, even extending con-<br />

siderably beyond the outer. One of the two specimens (fig. 2 b) was found,<br />

on a closer examination, to be just about to cast off its skin, and within the<br />

pellucid envelope a quite normal Cryptoniscian larva could be discerned, exactly<br />

agreeing with a form that I had previously not infrequently<br />

found free in the sea<br />

(fig. 2 c). The latter exhibits all the characters indicated by Dr. Hansen 1<br />

) as<br />

peculiar to the larvae belonging to the family Cryptoniscidce, and some of these<br />

characters could also be very distinctly seen in the Microniscus stage mentioned<br />

above (cf. the detail figures 2 b and 2 c).<br />

From the two above given series of observations, it is thus clearly shown,<br />

firstly, that a true Microniscus, apparently identical with the form previously<br />

recorded by the present author as M. calani, develops from the 1st stage<br />

of a normal Bopyrid lai'va; secondly, that another form of Microniscus, after<br />

having attained its normal development, is transformed by a single exuviation into<br />

the well-known 2nd larval stage, generally termed the Cryptoniscian stage ; thirdly,<br />

that these 2 forms of Microniscus, though exhibiting a very similar appearance,<br />

in reality belong to 2 very different families of Epicarida, the one to the Bopij-<br />

ridce, the other to the Cryptoniscidce. In other words the name Microniscus<br />

cannot in future be taken in the formerly-adopted sense as a generic denomi-<br />

nation, but must be restricted to designate a transitory developmental stage of<br />

Epicarida connecting the 2 previously-known larval stages.<br />

It is rather difficult at present to state with certainty, to which species<br />

of Epicarida the 2 above-mentioned Micronisci belong ; but I am much inclined<br />

to believe that the one form will turn out to be a developing stage of Phryxus<br />

abdominalisj and the other a similar stage of a species belonging to the genus<br />

Podascon of Gdard and Bonnier.<br />

Isopoda, Cumacea and Stomatopoda of the German Plankton-Expedition, p. 22.'

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!