15.06.2013 Views

download pdf

download pdf

download pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

157<br />

Remarks. This form was described as early as in the year 1767 by<br />

Linnaeus as Oniscus oceanicus, and has subsequently been recorded by Leach and<br />

Bosc under different specific names. It is the largest of our indigenous Oniscoida,<br />

and is moreover easily recognizable by the strongly built antennae and the struc-<br />

ture of the uropoda.<br />

Occurrence. Along the western coast of Norway<br />

this form occurs rather<br />

plentifully, and extends northwards at least to the Trondhjem Fjord. In the<br />

inner part of the Christiania Fjord, on the other hand, I have never met with<br />

it, and it would seem therefore that it deserves its specific name, being appar-<br />

ently restricted to those coasts that are open to the oceans. It is always found<br />

close to the shore, just above high-water-mark, beneath decaying algae and stones,<br />

feeding, it would seem, both on animal and vegetable matter. When alarmed, it<br />

runs away with great agility, to conceal itself in the crevices of the rocks, and<br />

beneath stones.<br />

Faro Islands.<br />

Distribution. Coasts of Denmark, Prussia, Belgium, France, Spain, Britain,<br />

Gen. 2. Ligldlum, Brandt, 1833.<br />

Syn: Zia, Kocli.<br />

Generic Characters. Body oblong, rather convex,<br />

attenuated behind. Ce-<br />

phalon evenly rounded in front. Lateral parts of mesosome less prominent than<br />

in Liyia-j and not defined from the corresponding segments by any distinct groove.<br />

Metasorne comparatively small and abruptly contracted, with the last segment of<br />

inconsiderable size and without jiny epimeral plates. Eyes large and convex.<br />

Antennulse less rudimentary than in Ligia, and distinctly projecting in front.<br />

Antenna less strongly built than in that genus, though of a very similar struc-<br />

ture. Mandibles with a restricted number of penicils, and without any ciliated<br />

lappet behind the cutting part. Maxillipeds more slender than in Ligia, with<br />

the terminal part less expanded, epignath narrow linguiform. Legs very slender,<br />

and greatly increasing in length posteriorly. Opercular plates of pleopoda very<br />

thin, without any obvious branchial structure. Uropoda not very large, basal part pro-<br />

duced at the end inside to a conical process carrying the inner ramus, the latter,<br />

as a rule, smaller than the outer, and provided with 2 long and slender apical<br />

bristles.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!