15.06.2013 Views

download pdf

download pdf

download pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

228<br />

area in front. Caudal part of body continuous with the preceding part, and<br />

forming below a slight hollow, in which the male is found attached. Marsupial<br />

rooms approximate along the middle of the ventral face, though not contiguous.<br />

Antennae quite rudimentary, forming 4 extremely small and closely set<br />

tubercles just within the frontal margin. Oral cone short, simple. Maxillipeds,<br />

as in Nbtophryxtts, folded backwards over the comparatively small cordiform<br />

sternal plate. Only a single pair of distinctly developed incubatory plates present,<br />

issuing, as in Notophryxits from the bases of the anterior pair of legs. A nar-<br />

row longitudinal fold also extends on each side behind the oral area, terminating<br />

behind in a projecting lappet, which serves for closing the posterior openings of<br />

the marsupial cavities. Legs small, somewhat more slender than in Notophryxus,<br />

and densely crowded around the oral area. Pleopoda and uropoda wholly absent.<br />

Male with the nietasome rather produced and indistinctly segmented, last segment<br />

carrying 2 small appendages (uropoda). Parasitic on Mysidoe, being, as a rule,<br />

attached to the dorsal side of the carapace.<br />

Remarks. In some respects this genus agrees with that of Notopliryxus,<br />

especially as regards the structure of the oral parts and the reduction of the<br />

incubatory plates; but in other points it differs rather markedly,<br />

for instance in<br />

the pronouncedly clypeiform shape of the body in the female, the peculiar form of<br />

the cephalic part and the rudimentary condition of the antennas. The male also<br />

is easily distinguishable by the different structure of the metasome.<br />

We know as yet of only a single species belonging to this genus. For<br />

the form described by MM. Giard and Bonnier as A. Sarsi cannot in my<br />

opinion be maintained as such. In describing this form,<br />

the above authors have<br />

fallen into some serious errors as regards the structure of the antennae, oral<br />

parts and incubatory plates, and this may easily be accounted for by the fact,<br />

that they had for examination only a single specimen, which could not be dis-<br />

sected, as it belonged to a foreign collection.<br />

Aspidophryxus peltatus,<br />

(PI. XGVI).<br />

G. 0. Sars.<br />

Aspidophryxus jH'Uattt*, G. O. Sars, Oversigt af Norges Crustaceev, I, p. 72, PI. II, fig.s 12 15.<br />

Syn.: A.^iidophryxus Sarsi. Giard and Bonnier.<br />

( 'lin, ;t c 1t>rx. Body of fully grown female oval triangular<br />

in out-<br />

lying broadest in front and somewhat attenuated behind, terminating in an<br />

obtuse point. Dorsal face<br />

slightly vaulted, and exhibiting 5 or 6 indistinct

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!