30.06.2013 Views

Gram - SEAS

Gram - SEAS

Gram - SEAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

188 7 <strong>Gram</strong>maticalization across clauses<br />

Another source of complementizers is closely associated with nominal forms,<br />

hardly a surprising factor when we consider that complements are essentially<br />

clauses functioning as NPs. One nominal source of complementizers is pronouns.<br />

We will discuss the history of pronominal deictic that below in Section 7.4.1.<br />

Other nominal sources include case morphemes of various types. These may be<br />

prepositions or postpositions, including case prefixes and suffixes attached to a<br />

verb phrase or nominalized form of the verb. The following is from the Tungusic<br />

language Evenki:<br />

(27) ;lnii-m ;I;I-c;I;I-n saa-r;l si t;ln;lw;I ;lm;l-n;l;l-w;l;l-S.<br />

mother-my NEG-PAST-3SG know-(?) you yesterday come-PART-ACC-2SG<br />

'My mother doesn't know that you arrived yesterday.' (Comrie 1981: 83)<br />

The accusative case morpheme is added to the resultative participle of the<br />

verb come and the participle is seen to be nominal from both the case end­<br />

ing and the second-person-singular possessor suffix. Genetti (1991) provides<br />

a detailed account of the development of postpositions into subordinators in<br />

Newari, and of cross-linguistic evidence of similar changes in other Tibeto-Burman<br />

languages.<br />

Often the parallelism with an ordinary noun phrase is obvious, as in instances<br />

such as the Evenki one in (27), and in English:<br />

(28) a. He left without telling the guide.<br />

b. He left without his compass.<br />

Sometimes the similarity is not so clear because the historical origins have become<br />

obscured. For example, in English the infinitive in to functions as the object of<br />

some complement-taking verbs, but the parallelism with the "allative" proposition<br />

to may not seem obvious:<br />

(29) a. We want to ask you a few questions.<br />

b. We handed the box to the officer.<br />

Absent historical data, one might wrongly assume that the two instances of to were<br />

simply fortuitous homonyms. However, because the reanalysis of a dative-allative<br />

particle as a complementizer is widespread, it is methodologically appropriate to<br />

assume that there might indeed be some motivation for the form. For instance, in<br />

Maori ki is both a dative and an allative, and is a complementizer with the same<br />

kinds of verbs as English want, etc.:<br />

(30) a. Allative<br />

E hoki ana<br />

PRES return PROG<br />

'I am going back to the village.'<br />

au ki te kaainga.<br />

to the village

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!