Gram - SEAS
Gram - SEAS
Gram - SEAS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
252 References<br />
Kemenade, Ans van. I 999b. Functional categories, morphosyntactic change, grammaticalization.<br />
Linguistics 37: 997-1010.<br />
Kemeilade, Ans van, and Nigel Vincent, eds. 1997. Parameters of Morpho syntactic Change.<br />
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1992. <strong>Gram</strong>matical prototypes and competing motivations in a theory<br />
of linguistic change. In Garry Davis and Gregory Iverson, eds., Explanation ill Historical<br />
Linguistics, 145-66. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (Current Issues in Linguistic<br />
Theory 84)<br />
Kemmer, Suzanne. I 993a. Middle voice, transitivity, and the elaboration of events.<br />
In Barbara Fox and Paul Hopper, eds., Vo ice: Fo rm and Function, 179-230. Amsterdam:<br />
Benjamins. (Typological Studies in Language 27)<br />
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993b. The Middle Vo ice. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (Typological Studies<br />
in Language 23)<br />
Kilian-Hatz, Christa. 1995. Das Baka: Grundziige einer <strong>Gram</strong>matik aus der <strong>Gram</strong>matikalisationsperspektive.<br />
Cologne: Universitiit KOln, Institut fUr Afrikanistik. (Afrikanistische<br />
Monographien Nr. 6)<br />
Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In Bach and Harms, eds.,<br />
171-202.<br />
Kiparsky, Paul. 1988. Phonological change. In Newmeyer, ed., vol. I: 362-4 15.<br />
Kiparsky, Paul. 1992. Analogy. In William Bright, ed., International Encyclopedia of<br />
Linguistics, vol. I: 56-6 1. New York: Oxford University Press.<br />
Kiss, Katalin E., ed. 1995. Discourse Configurational Languages. New York: Oxford<br />
University Press.<br />
Klaiman, M. H. 1976. Correlative clauses and IE syntactic reconstruction. In Steever et aI.,<br />
eds., 159-68.<br />
Klamer, Marian. 2000. How report verbs become quote markers and complementizers.<br />
Lingua 110: 69-98.<br />
Klavans, Judith L. 1985. The independence of syntax and phonology in c1iticization.<br />
Language 61: 95-1 20.<br />
Ktlnig, Ekkehard. 1 986. Conditionals, concessive conditionals, and concessives. In Traugott,<br />
Elizabeth Closs, Alice ter Meulen, Judy Snitzer Reilly, and Charles A. Ferguson,<br />
eds., On Conditionals, 229-46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />
Kortmann, Bernd, and Ekkehard Ktlnig. 1992. Categorial reanalysis: the case of deverbal<br />
prepositions. Linguistics 30: 67 1-97.<br />
Koster, Jan. 1987. Why subject sentences don't exist. In S. Jay Keyser, ed., Recent Transformational<br />
Studies ill European Languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Linguistic<br />
Inquiry Monographs 3)<br />
Ktlvecses, Zoltan. 2002. Metaphor: a Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University<br />
Press.<br />
Ktlvecses, Zoltan, and GUnter Radden. 1998. Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistic<br />
view. Cognitive Linguistics 9: 37-77.<br />
Kroch, Anthony S. 1989a. Function and grammar in the history of English: periphrastic DO.<br />
In Ralph W. Fasold and Deborah Schiffrin, eds., Language Change and Va riation,<br />
133-72. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (CulTent Issues in Linguistic Theory 52)<br />
Kroch, Anthony S. 1989b. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language<br />
Va riation and Change I: 199-244.<br />
Kroch, Anthony S. 1994. Morphosyntactic variation. In Beals et al., eds., 180-20 1.