2007 PhD Thesis Final Revised.pdf - Curtin University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Carter, W. (2000, 2000). Bruce Maguire vs. Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic Games (SOCOG). Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission: Disability Discrimination Act 1992 No. H 99/115 Retrieved 20 December, 2001, from http://scaleplus.law.gov.au/html/ddadec/0/2000/0/DD000120.htm Cavana, R. Y., & Delahaye, B. L. (2001). Applied Business Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Milton: Wiley & Sons Australia. Clarke, R. (2001). A Brief History of the Internet in Australia Version 3.1. 2002, from http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/II/OzIHist.html Clear, M. (2000). Promises, Promises : Disability and Terms of Inclusion. Leichhardt: Federation Press. Coloridge, P. (1993). Disability, Liberation and Development. Oxford: Oxfam. Coudroglou, A., & Poole, D. (1984). Disability, work, and Social Policy : Models for Social Welfare. New York: Springer. Davies, A. C. (1984). The Home Computer Course Introduction. The Home Computer Course, 1, i-ii. Davison, R. (2004, 15 July). IDC: Apple #5 in US Market with 3.7%. Retrieved 1 October, 2004, from http://www.insanelygreatmac.com/news.php?id=3571 Deutsch, H., & Nussbaum, F. (2000). Defects Engendering the Modern Body. Michigan: <strong>University</strong> of Michigan. Digital Divide Network. (2002, 2002). Digital Divide Basics Fact Sheet. Retrieved 6 Aug, 2002, from http://digitaldividenetwork.org/content/stories/index.cfm?key=168 Dorman, S. (1998). Assistive Technology Benefits for Students with Disabilities. Journal of School Health, 68(3), 120-123. Drake, R. (1999). Understanding Disability Policies. London: MacMillian. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2002). People with Disabilities. Retrieved 20 September, 2004, from http://europe.osha.eu.int/good_practice/person/disability/indexbytopic11.php ?id=471 Foulke, E. (1971). The Perceptual Basis for Mobility. AFB Resource Bulletin(23), 1- 8. Fulcher, G. (1989). Disabling Policies?: a Comparative Approach to Education Policy and Disability. London: Falmer. 245
Galitz, W. (2002). Essential Guide to User Interface Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Gerber, E., & Kirchner, C. (2001, 2001). Who's Surfing? Internet Access and Computer Use by Visually Impaired Youths and Adults. Retrieved 21 Oct, 2004, from http://www.afb.org/section.asp?Documentid=1521 Gergen, M. (1986). Computer Technology for the Handicapped. Minnesota: Crow River Press. Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. New York: Ace Books. Giridhar, P., Dandona, R., Prasad, M., Koval, V., & Dandona, L. (2002). Fear of Blindness and Perceptions about Blind People: The Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Retrieved 10 March, 2005, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed &list_uids=12355705&dopt=Abstract Goggin, G., & Mewell, C. (2003). Digital Disability - The Social Construction of Disability In New Media. New York: Rowman and Littlefield. Harper, W., Kingsbury, J., & Hassell, J. (2002). Accessibility Study of BBCi: Problems Faced by Users with Disabilities. Retrieved 6 June, 2003 Hickman, L., & Longman, C. (1994). Business Interviewing. Berkshire: Addison- Wesley. Hinn, M. (1999). Access Issues and Web Page Design. Tech Trends, 43(4), 19. Hollier, S. (2004, 22-27 August). Digital Disability An Examination into the Effectiveness of Multi-Modal Interfaces for People with Disabilities. Paper presented at the IFIP 18th World Computer Congress, Toulouse, France. Hollier, S., & Murray, I. (2004, 22-27 August). The Evolution of E-Inclusion: Technology in Education for the Vision Impaired. Paper presented at the IFIP 18th World Computer Congress, Toulouse, France. Hood, J. (1996). Taking the Byte out of Disability. Policy Review Washington(76), 6. Hoover, R. (1950). The Cane as a Visual Aid. New York: <strong>University</strong> Press. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. (2002, August 2002). World Wide Web Access: Disability Descrimination Act Advisory Notes. Retrieved 20 October, 2004, from http://www.hreoc.gov.au/disability_rights/standards/www_3/www_3.html#s2 _2 246
Page 1 and 2:
Faculty of Media, Society and Cultu
Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACT People with disabilities,
Page 5 and 6:
3.0 ELEMENTS OF THE DISABILITY DIVI
Page 7 and 8:
APPENDIX A: PERSONAL INTERVIEWS....
Page 9 and 10:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following orga
Page 11 and 12:
INTRODUCTION Purpose of the study A
Page 13 and 14:
! Are computing and Internet-relate
Page 15 and 16:
disabilities in the workforce. As a
Page 17 and 18:
entertainment package and, at worst
Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 6, The provision of operati
Page 21 and 22:
Australia, approximately four milli
Page 23 and 24:
which people with disabilities perc
Page 25 and 26:
dependence (J. Wilson & Wilson, 200
Page 27 and 28:
economic model complements the righ
Page 29 and 30:
ole of people with disabilities, go
Page 31 and 32:
time. Policy and resulting legislat
Page 33 and 34:
improved, funds were now available
Page 35 and 36:
United Nations (UN) during the Inte
Page 37 and 38:
actions and participation is connec
Page 39 and 40:
occasional struggle for people with
Page 41 and 42:
lindness within society also create
Page 43 and 44:
communication. This chapter contrib
Page 45 and 46:
seen as applicable to the developme
Page 47 and 48:
Although clear-path and object-anal
Page 49 and 50:
easily interpret text, making the A
Page 51 and 52:
interface in their next OS release.
Page 53 and 54:
networks so that there is exchange
Page 55 and 56:
of information largely inaccessible
Page 57 and 58:
again become sufficiently accessibl
Page 59 and 60:
Figure 3.1 Household Computer or In
Page 61 and 62:
of tertiary education compound the
Page 63 and 64:
desire to repair the inferior body
Page 65 and 66:
computing firms seemed to take issu
Page 67 and 68:
an operating environment which was
Page 69 and 70:
accessible and compatible with AT p
Page 71 and 72:
cater for the needs of this group.
Page 73 and 74:
4.2 Methodology for personal interv
Page 75 and 76:
! Steger, John. Senior Consultant,
Page 77 and 78:
All of these points were used with
Page 79 and 80:
ates improved significantly due to
Page 81 and 82:
(f) to assist in achieving positive
Page 83 and 84:
disability-related discrimination i
Page 85 and 86:
was that Section 508 only applied t
Page 87 and 88:
in order to combat the disability d
Page 89 and 90:
Such views again highlight the inco
Page 91 and 92:
vision disabilities must rely on US
Page 93 and 94:
5.0 THE PROVISION OF ONLINE INFORMA
Page 95 and 96:
exist but not how to resolve the pr
Page 97 and 98:
ace information for the Sydney 2000
Page 99 and 100:
Essentially, the SOCOG case present
Page 101 and 102:
In terms of finding out what people
Page 103 and 104:
devices. The study concluded that t
Page 105 and 106:
6.0 THE PROVISION OF OPERATING SYST
Page 107 and 108:
networking infrastructure market, w
Page 109 and 110:
Internet were accessible, it could
Page 111 and 112:
developer conferences as a good way
Page 113 and 114:
6.3 Disability-specific product ven
Page 115 and 116:
company which tries to do everythin
Page 117 and 118:
user through to large networks and
Page 119 and 120:
with low vision was the addition of
Page 121 and 122:
The UNIX platform has faced a diffi
Page 123 and 124:
of writing, Microsoft is being sued
Page 125 and 126:
character containing two dots. Brai
Page 127 and 128:
Figure 6.7 Vario 80 Refreshable Bra
Page 129 and 130:
Figure 6.10 Omni Phantom (SensAble
Page 131 and 132:
addition there are other input-base
Page 133 and 134:
HP, Cisco and IBM have all contribu
Page 135 and 136:
‘upper-echelons’ of users would
Page 137 and 138:
such as Vision Australia located at
Page 139 and 140:
internal policies reflect the need
Page 141 and 142:
arely given the chance to voice the
Page 143 and 144:
1. to demonstrate the ways in which
Page 145 and 146:
Section B focused on the use of com
Page 147 and 148:
question was to determine the exten
Page 149 and 150:
defined opinions in this study. The
Page 151 and 152:
the type and significance of an ind
Page 153 and 154:
The print and Braille formats were
Page 155 and 156:
with 23 telephone interviews and 3
Page 157 and 158:
Frequency 100 80 60 40 20 0 Valid 1
Page 159 and 160:
Valid Male Female Total Gender Freq
Page 161 and 162:
Frequency 200 150 100 50 0 Valid Fu
Page 163 and 164:
Valid Degenerative Stable Total Vis
Page 165 and 166:
Frequency 100 80 60 40 20 0 Valid M
Page 167 and 168:
7.4.2 Computing and assistive techn
Page 169 and 170:
Frequency 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Kno
Page 171 and 172:
Frequency 100 80 60 40 20 0 Ability
Page 173 and 174:
Frequency 150 120 90 60 30 0 Valid
Page 175 and 176:
Frequency 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
Page 177 and 178:
N Valid Missing Familiarity of Inte
Page 179 and 180:
Frequency 125 100 75 50 25 0 Valid
Page 181 and 182:
Frequency 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Val
Page 183 and 184:
Frequency 100 80 60 40 20 0 Valid D
Page 185 and 186:
Internet session will contain a var
Page 187 and 188:
Frequency 250 200 150 100 50 0 Vali
Page 189 and 190:
Frequency 250 200 150 100 50 0 Vali
Page 191 and 192:
Frequency 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Dis
Page 193 and 194:
Frequency 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Gov
Page 195 and 196: Frequency 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
Page 197 and 198: Frequency 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Des
Page 199 and 200: Frequency 100 80 60 40 20 0 Valid I
Page 201 and 202: 7.4.5 Open-ended comments The Comme
Page 203 and 204: There were also a number of comment
Page 205 and 206: 8.0 ANALYSIS OF FINDINGS 8.1 Introd
Page 207 and 208: levels of the working population. A
Page 209 and 210: the colour scheme question received
Page 211 and 212: Respondents were fairly evenly spre
Page 213 and 214: esult indicated that it is likely t
Page 215 and 216: able to interact with computing and
Page 217 and 218: Count Ability to Understand and Use
Page 219 and 220: Ability to Understand and Use a Com
Page 221 and 222: that knowledge of IT did not necess
Page 223 and 224: impaired people were not associated
Page 225 and 226: Count Income Total Income * Cost of
Page 227 and 228: 8.3.5 Disability-specific issues fo
Page 229 and 230: The final comparison focused on the
Page 231 and 232: CONCLUSION Addressing the research
Page 233 and 234: with vision disabilities until the
Page 235 and 236: ole of this policy, in terms of inf
Page 237 and 238: een largely resolved in recent time
Page 239 and 240: vision disabilities perceived the I
Page 241 and 242: In essence, this study has revealed
Page 243 and 244: ! the creation and implementation o
Page 245: Australian Federal Government. (200
Page 249 and 250: Lindlif, T. R., & Shatzer, M. J. (1
Page 251 and 252: Stubbins, J. (1977). Social and Psy
Page 253 and 254: Zakon, R. (2002, 1 April). Hobbes'
Page 255 and 256: ETHICS APPROVAL: products and servi
Page 257 and 258: Name: _ Signature: Date: authorizat
Page 259 and 260: 13. In the United States, the Rehab
Page 261 and 262: 8. Do you perceive that people with
Page 263 and 264: Title: Department: Organisation: Ye
Page 265 and 266: 18. In your opinion, are educationa
Page 267 and 268: e found at http://www.vipsurvey.org
Page 269 and 270: [ ] 2 Living in shared accommodatio
Page 271 and 272: [ ] 1 Screen magnification software
Page 273 and 274: 24. My ability to use the Internet
Page 275 and 276: process which I mastered by myself:
Page 277 and 278: ! 5.2 For data tables that have two
Page 279 and 280: ! 10.5 Until user agents (including
Page 281: IBM International Business Machines
show all

2007 PhD Thesis Final Revised.pdf - Curtin University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?