30.06.2013 Views

2007 PhD Thesis Final Revised.pdf - Curtin University

2007 PhD Thesis Final Revised.pdf - Curtin University

2007 PhD Thesis Final Revised.pdf - Curtin University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ability to define, discover, report, and measure the concept of disability (Coudroglou<br />

& Poole, 1984). Others believed that a professional body such as the WHO should<br />

have gone further in supporting professionals in the field and should have taken a<br />

more proactive role in addressing the welfare of people with disabilities.<br />

This criticism has resulted in the WHO keeping the definitions under constant<br />

review. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, the WHO definitions continued to undergo<br />

minor changes. In recent times, however, these definitions have undergone a major<br />

change. Several new drafts of the definitions, referred to as the ICIDH-2, were<br />

created and trialled through the mid to late 1990s. The result was a change of focus,<br />

finalised in 2001, and named the International Classification of Functioning,<br />

Disability and Health (ICF). The aim of the new ICF classification was to<br />

“…provide a unified and standard language and framework for the description of<br />

health and health-related states" (International Classification of Functioning<br />

Disability and Health, 2004, p3). The ICF indicated that in the past there were two<br />

main health-related disability models: the social model and the medical model. The<br />

social model was a combination of the charity and rights model where disability was<br />

defined as a social problem. The medical model, as previously discussed, suggested<br />

that a disability was a problem of the person (International Classification of<br />

Functioning Disability and Health, 2004).<br />

With the international health professions community accepting the ICF, the<br />

WHO believed it had promulgated new definitions of disability effectively.<br />

Disability could now be seen as a health issue affected by contextual factors.<br />

Kostanjsek (2004, p2) has recently defined ‘disability’ as follows:<br />

In the context of health, disability is an umbrella term for impairments,<br />

activity limitations and participation restrictions. It denotes the negative<br />

aspects of the interaction between an individual (with a health condition) and<br />

that individual’s contextual factors (environmental and personal factors).<br />

This definition endeavours to acknowledge the multi-dimensional nature of<br />

disability. The other associated terms within the ICF include these critical<br />

definitions: impairment is interpreted in relation to the functioning of body parts or<br />

organs; activity is seen in relation to the capacity of a person to do basic or complex<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!