01.07.2013 Views

PDF - CES (IISc)

PDF - CES (IISc)

PDF - CES (IISc)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER VIII<br />

SYSTEMATIC<br />

I. CLASSIFICATION<br />

A. WORK OF SUC<strong>CES</strong>SIVE SYSTEMATISTS<br />

SINCE the time when lichens were first recognized as a separate class<br />

as members of the genus Lichen by Tournefort 1 or as "Musco-fungi"<br />

by<br />

Morison 2<br />

, many<br />

schemes of classification have been outlined, and the<br />

history of the science of lichenology, as we have seen, is a record of attempts<br />

to understand their puzzling structure, and to express that understanding<br />

by relating them to each other and to allied classes of plants. The great<br />

diversity of opinion in regard to their affinities is directly due to their<br />

composite nature.<br />

a. DILLENIUS AND LINNAEUS. The first systematists were chiefly im-<br />

pressed by their likeness to mosses, hepatics or algae. Dillenius* in the<br />

Historia Muscorum grouped them under the moss genera: IV. Usnea,<br />

V. Coralloides and VI. Lichenoides. Linnaeus 4 classified them among algae<br />

under the general name Lichen, dividing them into eight orders based on<br />

thalline characters in all but one instance, the second order being distin-<br />

guished from the first by bearing scutellae. The British botanists of the<br />

latter part of the eighteenth century Hudson, Lightfoot and others were<br />

content to follow Linnaeus and in general adopted his arrangement.<br />

b. ACHARIUS. Early in the nineteenth century Acharius, the Swedish<br />

Lichenologist, worked a revolution in the classification of lichens. He gave<br />

first place to the form of the thallus, but he also noted the fundamental<br />

differences in fruit-formation: his new system appeared in the Methodus<br />

Lichenum 5 with an introduction explaining the terms he had introduced,<br />

many of them in use to this day.<br />

Diagnoses of twenty-three genera are given with their included species.<br />

The work was further extended and emended in Lichenographia Uni-<br />

versalis* and in the Synopsis Lichenum 1 . In his final arrangement the<br />

family "Lichenes" is divided into four classes, three of which are characterized<br />

solely by apothecial characters; the fourth class has no apothecia.<br />

They<br />

are as follows :<br />

Class I. Idiothalami with three orders, Homogenei, Heterogenei and Hyperogenei :<br />

the apothecia differ in texture and colouration from the thallus: Lecidea, Opegrapha,<br />

Gyrophora, etc.<br />

Class II. Coenothalami, with three orders, Phymaloidei, Discoidei and Cephaloidei.<br />

1<br />

Tournefort 1694.<br />

2 Morison 1699.<br />

3 Dillenius 1741.<br />

4<br />

Linnaeus 1753.<br />

6 Acharius 1803.<br />

6 Acharius 1810.<br />

7 Acharius 1814.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!