02.07.2013 Views

PIERRE BOAISTUAU - eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

PIERRE BOAISTUAU - eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

PIERRE BOAISTUAU - eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In order to better understand the term natural philosophy and its context in Histoires<br />

prodigieuses, a comment on the relationship between religion and ‘science’ at the<br />

time is first necessary. The initial thesis – expressed by titles such as John Draper’s<br />

History <strong>of</strong> the conflict between religion and science (1874) – which claimed theology<br />

to be an inhibiting force for scientific research in the sixteenth and seventeenth<br />

centuries, is nowadays refuted. Although Rudolf Wittkower’s point <strong>of</strong> view may still<br />

retain a certain degree <strong>of</strong> validity, the fact remains that the once popular idea <strong>of</strong><br />

persistent dissention between ‘science’ and religion is no longer accepted by the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> scholars. 807 Recent studies by Kenneth James Howell, John Brooke and<br />

Ian Maclean, and Kevin Killeen and Peter Forshaw, have established a new approach<br />

for examining the concept <strong>of</strong> dichotomy between theology and natural philosophy,<br />

proving their inextricable connection long before the time <strong>of</strong> Boaistuau. 808 The<br />

founding stone <strong>of</strong> this connection was laid by St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas,<br />

who put a Christian cloak on Aristotle’s natural philosophical theories. Augustine first<br />

set down the basic procedures for the application <strong>of</strong> natural philosophy to the<br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> the book <strong>of</strong> Genesis, and Thomas Aquinas, whilst he gave theology<br />

principal status amongst all human sciences, did not disregard natural philosophy for<br />

the assistance it could provide to biblical exegesis. 809<br />

807 Wittkower, R., ‘Marvels <strong>of</strong> the East: a study in the history <strong>of</strong> monsters’, Journal <strong>of</strong> the Warburg and<br />

Courtauld Institutes, vol. 5 (1942), p. 190: ‘The growing sense for causation in nature and the desire to<br />

discover its functions were weakened, however, under the weight <strong>of</strong> literary authority and timehonoured<br />

tradition’.<br />

808 Howell, K. J., God’s Two Books: Copernican Cosmology and Biblical Interpretation in Early<br />

Modern Science (Indiana, 2002); Brooke, J. Maclean, I. (eds), Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science<br />

and Religion (Oxford, 2005); Killeen, K., Forshaw, P. J. (eds), The Word and the World: Biblical<br />

Exegesis and Early Modern Science (Basingstoke, 2007).<br />

809 Augustine (ed. J. H. Taylor), The Literal Meaning <strong>of</strong> Genesis, 2 vols (New York, 1982). On Thomas<br />

Aquinas and natural philosophy a good place to start is Funkenstein, A., Theology and the Scientific<br />

Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century (Princeton, 1986), esp. pp. 3-9, 299-326,<br />

and Hood, J. Y. B. (ed.), The Essential Aquinas: Writings on Philosophy, Religion and Society<br />

(Westport, CT, 2002), Chapter II.<br />

- 255 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!