06.07.2013 Views

Nebraska Soils Field Trip - Virginia Tech

Nebraska Soils Field Trip - Virginia Tech

Nebraska Soils Field Trip - Virginia Tech

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Taxonomic Classifications of SND (12N0009)<br />

Soil Taxonomy<br />

KST, 11th ed. 2010 Fine-silty, mixed, superactive, nonacid, mesic Typic Udifluvents<br />

ICOMANTH (2-22-2012) Fine-silty, spolic, mixed, superactive, mesic Anthroportic Eutrudepts 3., 4.)<br />

WRB Haplic Cambisols (Humic, Hypereutric, Siltic, Escalic?, Transportic) 5., 6., 7.)<br />

1.)<br />

2.)<br />

3.)<br />

4.)<br />

Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 11th ed. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC.<br />

IUSS Working Group WRB. 2007. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006, first update 2007. World Soil Resources Reports No.103. FAO, Rome.<br />

5.) Weighted average organic carbon content is 2 percent in upper 50 cm of soil (i.e., Humic qualifier).<br />

6.) Since new material is less than 50 cm thick, the buried soil is classified at the first level.<br />

7.)<br />

4th IUSS Soil Classification Conference <strong>Field</strong> Tour Guidebook<br />

Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service.<br />

U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436<br />

These horizons constitute the "surface mantle of new soil material" as defined for buried soils in Chapter 1 of Soil Taxonomy and the Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Their aggregate thickness (47 cm) is<br />

within the range of 30 to 50 cm and equals at least half of the total thickness (i.e., 36 cm × 0.5 = 18 cm) of the named diagnostic horizons that are preserved in the buried soil. The current<br />

classification (based on KST, 2010) reflects presence of a buried soil.<br />

The ICOMANTH classification reflects the presence of human-transported material (HTM) on a constructional anthropogenic landform (landfill) and less than 50 cm of HTM mantling the<br />

underlying genetic horizons (formed in an older deposit of HTM).<br />

Pedon would classify in either the methanogenic or subsidic class if the proposed control section for human-altered and human-transported material classes extended to 200 cm.<br />

Is the Escalic qualifier intended only for agricultural terraces?<br />

The Transportic qualifier was used alone without the Novic qualifier to avoid redundancy. Is the Novic qualifier intended for natural parent materials instead of human-made materials?<br />

118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!