06.07.2013 Views

Nebraska Soils Field Trip - Virginia Tech

Nebraska Soils Field Trip - Virginia Tech

Nebraska Soils Field Trip - Virginia Tech

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4th IUSS Soil Classification Conference <strong>Field</strong> Tour Guidebook<br />

Figure WS3 presents the general loess thickness in the Midcontinent. The thickest loess occurs<br />

in western Iowa and south central NE. Two loess sources account for this distribution. One<br />

source is the Missouri Valley (Ruhe et al., 1967; Simonson and Hutton, 1954; Muhs and Bettis,<br />

2000), which served as glacial outlet beginning, at least during Illinoisan time (Mason, 2006.).<br />

Aleinikoff et al. (1998, 1999), using geochemical analysis showed that Peoria Loess across<br />

<strong>Nebraska</strong> came from non-glacial sources of the western Great Plains (White River and Arikeree<br />

siltstones). Mason (2001) reached similar conclusions using Peoria Loess thickness trends.<br />

Landscape Evolution<br />

Despite widespread occurrence of glacial and loess deposits, the field area is an erosional<br />

landscape that displays dissection and a well-integrated drainage. The terrain resembles<br />

erosional landscapes developed solely on relatively flat-lying sedimentary rocks. As the<br />

landscape declines in elevation from higher primary divides to lower secondary divides, younger<br />

stratigraphic units are truncated by erosion and older units are exhumed and exposed at the<br />

land surface (Hallberg, 1980). Ruhe1967, following extensive field study, developed a soil<br />

landscape and geomorphic model for southwest IA. This model is appropriate to the field area.<br />

Fig WS4 depicts this model.<br />

Four geomorphic surfaces descend from stream divides to major drainages. The uppermost<br />

surface is blanketed by loess that overlies a paleosol developed on till or a clay-rich material<br />

known as gumbotil (Kay, 1916), which is interpreted as weathering product from till. . The clayrich<br />

material may alternatively represent an early loess deposit (Woida and Thompson, 1993).<br />

Ruhe (1967) named the paleosol for time period it represented, the Yarmouth Sangamon (YS)<br />

paleosol (Yarmouth is the classical North American interglacial between Kansan and Illinoisan<br />

glaciations).<br />

Episodic erosion cut a pediment below the YS surface and the associated materials. This<br />

geomorphic surface Ruhe (1967) named the late-Sangamon Pediment. In Ruhe’s study area<br />

(Greenfield quadrangle, Adair County) the Loveland Loess is absent, elsewhere this erosion<br />

cycle removes or truncates the Loveland Loess. Hence, the paleosol formation period spans<br />

only a portion of the Sangamon interglacial and Ruhe refers to it as the Late Sangamon. The<br />

paleosol under this surface is formed in transported material called pedisediment (Ruhe and<br />

Cady, 1954). A traceable stone line lies below the pedisediment, which in turn is underlain by<br />

pre-Illinoisan till.<br />

Episodic erosion produced a second pediment during early Wisconsin time. This erosion cycle<br />

removed the pre-existing soil. The modern soil on this surface has reformed in the truncated,<br />

less-weathered pre-Illinoisan till. Wisconsin age loess originally covered this surface, but<br />

subsequent hillslope erosion removed it at the site shown in Figure WS4.<br />

An erosional down cutting cycle accompanied by headward stream incision and hillslope<br />

backwearing began in late Wisconsin time. All loess deposition predates this surface, hence<br />

modern soils form into the truncated pre-Illinoisan till. This erosional surface descends to<br />

Holocene alluvial deposits. This surface Ruhe (1967) called the late-Wisconsin dissection<br />

slope.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!