oscola.pdf. - Mirrors.med.harvard.edu

@inreference{halsbury5:57,
}
volume = {57},
date = {2010},
crossref = {halsbury5},
@inreference{friedrich68,
}
maintitle = {International Encyclopaedia of the
date = {1968}
Social Sciences III},
title = {Constitutions and Constitutionalism},
author = {Friedrich, C. J.},
pages = 319,
\cite[123]{halsbury5:57} Halsbury’s Laws (5th edn 2010) vol 57, para 123
\cite{friedrich68} CJ Friedrich ‘Constitutions and Constitutionalism’,
International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences III
(1968)
(Note that, in example 94 the ‘volume’ of the encyclopaedia was included
in the title. This is a fudge, in order to get the reference to appear as it does
in oscola. 47 It would have been perfectly possible to give a volume reference
here, but that would have produced a slighly different format: correct, but not
exactly as it is in the Oscola handbook at this point.): CJ Friedrich ‘Constitutions
and Constitutionalism’, International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences
vol III (1968))
Looseleaf works
The oscola standard requires very minimal information for looseleaf works.
Give such works the entry type reference or mvreference, and set the option
looseleaf=true. You will need to include the information required by
oscola (such as the precise update of the page to which you refer) in your
postnote manually.
@reference{cross,
title = {Cross on Local Government Law},
options = {looseleaf}}
\cite{cross} Cross on Local Government Law, para 11
\cite[para 8-106 (R 30 July 2008)]{cross}
Cross on Local Government Law, para 8–106 (R 30 July
2008)
47 oscola, 36.
Books 62
[93]
[94]
[95]