31.07.2013 Views

THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY ARTS AND SCIENCES ...

THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY ARTS AND SCIENCES ...

THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY ARTS AND SCIENCES ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 6.1 Estimation of Nitrate Loss due to denitrification (Lund et al., 2000).<br />

Lund et al. (2000) have used this method to estimate the percent of nitrate removed due<br />

to denitrification in a wetlands environment in southern California. Using this method<br />

and by considering a laboratory derived value of −17‰ as the enrichment factor strictly<br />

due to denitrification, 63 % of the losses could be attributed to denitrification.<br />

The main disadvantage to this approach is that there is a range of enrichments factors for<br />

denitrification. The enrichment factors are derived based on laboratory testing and as<br />

such there is a wide range of values that can be used, while this may possibly be<br />

attributed to differences in methodology it may be possible that the differences in the<br />

enrichment factor are due to different denitrification rate constants and substrate<br />

concentration. (Ostrom et al., 2002).<br />

Pintar et al. (2008) and Sovik and Morkved (2007) have used this method to estimate the<br />

percent of nitrate lost due to denitrification in wetlands and have found that isotopes can<br />

be a useful semi-quantitative tool to quantify denitrification. Several other authors<br />

(Steingruber et al., 2001; Smith et al., 1978, 2004) have used isotopes to measure<br />

denitrification.<br />

158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!