31.07.2013 Views

THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY ARTS AND SCIENCES ...

THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY ARTS AND SCIENCES ...

THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY ARTS AND SCIENCES ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

where, N is the nitrate concentration, S is the Soil Saturation and T is the temperature.<br />

The model developed is unable to predict the denitrification rate (Rdn) (Figure 1.4); this is<br />

perhaps because organic carbon is not considered as a factor in the development of the<br />

equation. In addition as the model was empirically developed it is feasible only for areas<br />

which are similar to the study area. The model is based on only five different sets of data<br />

and is hence limited in its use.<br />

Actual<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Colbourn (1992) - Denitrificaiton Rate : Predicted Vs. Actual<br />

10<br />

20<br />

Predicted<br />

Figure 1.4 Predicted denitrification rates based on Equation 1.10.<br />

1.5.4. Anderson (1998)<br />

This is perhaps the least complicated method to determine the denitrification rate. Many<br />

authors consider organic carbon to be the primary controlling factor of the denitrification<br />

rate (Burford and Bermner, 1975; Knowles, 1982; Smith and Duff, 1988; Bradley et al.,<br />

1992; Korom, 1992,Cosandey et al., 2003; Kamewada, 2007). In addition several authors<br />

believe that the denitrification rate is directly proportional to the amount of organic<br />

carbon (Burford and Bermner, 1975; Smith and Duff, 1988; Bradley et al., 1992). Hence,<br />

21<br />

30<br />

40<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!