Part 1 - The Institute Libraries - Institute for Advanced Study

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Dr. Flexner "quoted scripturem to ease Mitrany's fears, for the Professor, still in England, had heard indirectly that Flexner con- sidered first a rathematical economist, and now an expert in money and rates. Hitrany was not reassured; he repeated his demands for a philo- sophical economist, and above all, for a congenial group. As for Dr. Riefler, had he been informed with equal candor of Mr. Stewart's views. he might have had serious misgivings about his future career in research at the Institute. He decided to accept the offer from Flexner late in December. While Hr. Frankfurter had been given to understand that Dr. Riefler was being interviewed by the Director and Mr. Stewart, Plexner's notes and agenda did not announce his intention to nominate the economist at the January meeting. To the Trustees, Dr. Flexner gave a brief description of Dr. Riefler's qualifications, and expressed the hope that the three men then in the School of Econmics and Politics would be able to work to- gether in internatio~l politics and economics. They would have the same autonouy, individually and as a School, as was enjoyed in the School of Mathematics. The appointment was unanimously approved, but Mr. Prank- furter took vigorous exception to the fact that Flexner proposed and the Board granted a salary for the econmist which exceeded by $2,000 the full-time rates of his absent colleagues in the School. The minutes say that "standardizedn rates were discussed, and noted "that most of the Board vas opposed to the principle." Mr. Frankfurter asked to be recorded as opposed to the differential, maintaining that either Riefler should \ receive the same salary as Earle and Hitrany, or that their salaries \ '. -, . should be raised to equal his. 54 - \
Two days after the meeting, Frankfurter at Harvard wrote the folloving letter to Dr. Riefler, sending a copy to Flexner. Ever since I have been on this faculty, for now a little over twenty years, it has been ry practice to tell acquaintances whose names have come up for consideration directly what doubts or difficulties I mzy have had to rzise in faculty meting. This avoids misunderstanding through the dangers of misreport, however'innocent, through indirect transmission. That practice of candor seems to me to be equally appropriate for you and se in the case of the Institute for Advanced Study. Therefore, I should like you to knov that I welcomed your ac- cession to the Institute znd voted for it with pleasure and hope. But I voted against the stipend proposed by Dr. Flexner, not beczuse it was too high, but beeuse it was higher than that given to your colleagues in the School of Politics and Economics. For I deem inequality of treatment among men of substantially similar age and scholarly distinction as inimical to the airs of a society of scholars. This is not the occas- ion to argue the matter; I sirply wanted you to know precisely what my attitude was towards your coning to the Institute, and to the conditions of your coming. If you have to leave governtr~ent -- and I wnnot conceal my regret that you are doing so, in view of my great interest in a permanent civil service -- I am at least happy that you are giving yourself to sch0larshi~.5~ Reactions were prompt and .severe. Dr. Riefler vas shocked and' unhappy. He sought to withdraw from the appointment, and suggested that Mr. Frankfurter bring the matter before the Board for reconsideration. He had great respect for the lavyer. As for Flexner, his anger was now fully aroused. He vrote Frankfurter declaring that his letter to Rief- ler was a "piece of unmitigated impertinence;" he was notifying the Comittee on Nominations that "under no circumstances can they nominate both me and you for re-election. They shall have to choose between us.n56 To Riefler he vrote: I wish to assure you once more that there is nothing within reason that we will not do to enable you to fulfill your own ambitions and to make you and your family happy in this new enviro~rent.~~
Page 1:
A HISTORY OF TEE INSTITUTE POR ADVA
Page 5 and 6:
TmLE OF CONTESTS INTRODUCTION . . .
Page 7 and 8:
1 \ -c. --- ft 5s safe to 52)- that
Page 9 and 10:
ot;-tervise would have b ~en lackin
Page 12 and 13:
medical school. Such a school, he s
Page 14 and 15:
them to abandon their intention to
Page 16 and 17:
in the "plans already in effect.* N
Page 18 and 19:
2. B. Grznting only the Doctor's an
Page 20 and 21:
men of the nost distinguished stand
Page 22 and 23:
Frank Aydelotte of Swarthmore Colle
Page 24 and 25:
to purckse, retaining the right to
Page 26 and 27:
Board of Directors approved the pur
Page 28 and 29:
man whose warm hwn qualities, wisdo
Page 30 and 31:
Th9 third phase began with the Rode
Page 32 and 33:
dominant classical tradition of the
Page 34 and 35:
the United States and Canada. He ac
Page 36 and 37:
expenditure of sorething like $500
Page 38 and 39:
in dominating spirit znd interest t
Page 40 and 41:
for college graduates, reseerch ins
Page 42 and 43:
quality to hirrself. ft was a susta
Page 44 and 45:
ment," without explanation. Dr. Fle
Page 46 and 47:
November, 1930, creating enew the s
Page 48 and 49:
easonable certainties they have lea
Page 50 and 51:
third-year college stu&nt in thls c
Page 52 and 53:
John C. French, A History of the Un
Page 54 and 55:
men vith which he charged a few Eas
Page 56 and 57:
tions in the hope that better days
Page 58 and 59:
What could be expected, if a modern
Page 60 and 61:
He wrote: I am sending you kere-uft
Page 62 and 63:
worthy of your beneficent idealism.
Page 64 and 65:
sible for the eonduct of the businm
Page 66 and 67:
the intent to train and guide stude
Page 68 and 69:
emitted as trustees give promise...
Page 70 and 71:
criticize freely in whole or in par
Page 72 and 73:
Mr. Roughton was an elder statesran
Page 74 and 75:
even in America. Fs pledged hinelf
Page 76 and 77:
the number to the fifteen provided
Page 78 and 79:
Mr. Barnbergex's proposal gave the
Page 80 and 81:
Vice-himn was provided for, The Boa
Page 82 and 83:
CHAPTER fX - NOTES 1. Goodspeed, op
Page 84 and 85:
Re shall, after conference with t k
Page 86 and 87:
CHAfTER I11 PLAPriING TEE ESTITUTE
Page 88 and 89:
in research, whereas, la projecting
Page 90 and 91:
a delay in action. The Board could
Page 92 and 93:
I have finished the second draft of
Page 94 and 95:
Universities, being prirrarily inte
Page 96 and 97:
\ . science; the school of economic
Page 98 and 99:
merh~rs of the Institute, and perso
Page 100 and 101:
applied science, and progress in ph
Page 102 and 103:
it right be decided that schools in
Page 104 and 105:
had all too ilttle of it. He had be
Page 106 and 107:
as a location; the mjority advised
Page 108 and 109:
Meanwhile, in Jznuary 1932, the Dir
Page 110 and 111:
Institute were not required to teac
Page 112 and 113:
and the natural sciences. 26 Suqris
Page 114 and 115:
+ this cen chosen were drzwn togeth
Page 116 and 117:
and laborious in a university, 35 D
Page 118 and 119:
Director on a par with the Institut
Page 120 and 121:
, furter, though still agreeing uit
Page 122 and 123:
I am firmly convinced that the absu
Page 124 and 125:
of the University had it held itsel
Page 126 and 127:
Foundation for Scientific Research,
Page 128 and 129:
18. Minutes, Trusteesr meeting, 1/1
Page 130 and 131:
CHAmm IT TEE SCHOOL OF HAIkXWTfCS T
Page 132 and 133:
fields of rwtherratics and its eppl
Page 134 and 135:
\\ \ based on the lot of the young
Page 136 and 137:
one man was only a "nu~leus,~ vhile
Page 138 and 139:
they would meet zt Oxford Universit
Page 140 and 141:
Cruel indecision now assailed Birkh
Page 142 and 143:
destined in their judgment "to hit
Page 144 and 145:
California Institute of Technology'
Page 146 and 147:
wbtsoever. As for himelf, he looked
Page 148 and 149:
confidentially ex2ressed misgivings
Page 150 and 151:
hononed him, Dr. Einstein first vis
Page 152 and 153:
of the story, and photographs of Ei
Page 154 and 155:
My point was not that you were raki
Page 156 and 157:
uri tteri: The first problen! of co
Page 158 and 159:
sam thing to Dr. Weyl, plagued as h
Page 160 and 161:
sox Einstein is thus a distinct add
Page 162 and 163:
Unfortunately, Veblen used Flexnerl
Page 164 and 165:
over the "transferm of the three me
Page 166 and 167:
feared Veblents diqleasure should h
Page 168 and 169:
Professor Veblen bore in the Founde
Page 170 and 171:
either a full and permanent member
Page 172 and 173:
deciding who should be admitted, su
Page 174 and 175:
This was written when Veblen though
Page 176 and 177:
protect the Institute in deciding n
Page 178 and 179:
Then came the French Consul to offe
Page 180 and 181:
ideological extremes in Germany had
Page 182 and 183:
pointed on a rainy Manhattan dock w
Page 184 and 185:
in routing the correspondence. He c
Page 186 and 187:
Professor Veblen was one who had be
Page 188 and 189:
young n-mnber f xom Prague. He noti
Page 190 and 191:
-- '\ Ih you how why Einstein said
Page 192 and 193: Oxford, he should seek to reopen ne
Page 194 and 195: Alexander bve talked to re about Ho
Page 196 and 197: enthusiasm, ability, and nm.bers fa
Page 198 and 199: mar, of the joirit cnmittee of trrr
Page 200 and 201: He estimated it would cost $3,000 t
Page 202 and 203: 61. Flexner to Veblen, 12/9/32; 12/
Page 204 and 205: 97. Plewser to bass, 2/19/34. Jesse
Page 206 and 207: CHAPTER V TEZE SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS
Page 208 and 209: those of the Vice-president beceae
Page 210 and 211: about durq educaticnal directors. T
Page 212 and 213: While Stewart mistrusted apoliticia
Page 214 and 215: wanted, it was of the economist, an
Page 216 and 217: ecause of his liberal policies, a d
Page 218 and 219: was goins to London to become '.onm
Page 220 and 221: were to be asserted in a series of
Page 222 and 223: No, I don't expect to be wholly a d
Page 224 and 225: friend of the Director since 1928.
Page 226 and 227: that neither he nor the Trustees wo
Page 228 and 229: and discontent among scholars. Vain
Page 230 and 231: as a member of the Board. 36 Hr. Fr
Page 232 and 233: and the luxury of agreeing with him
Page 234 and 235: onic point of view but from an hist
Page 236 and 237: When Mr. Maass received the minutes
Page 238 and 239: attitude on the acceptability of Ma
Page 240 and 241: consider itself as a location but r
Page 244 and 245: Unfortunately, this was a cmitment
Page 246 and 247: Dr. Flemer had kept President Dodds
Page 248 and 249: &re at last vas the kind of program
Page 250 and 251: He may have been hoping to secure f
Page 252 and 253: eceived, and of one "unethusiastic"
Page 254 and 255: ultiaately a budget of $100,000 a y
Page 256 and 257: But the beginning of September was
Page 258 and 259: economists could visit to talk abou
Page 260 and 261: of discontent for Flexner, though t
Page 262 and 263: egarded work of his career before h
Page 264 and 265: CHAPTER V - NOTES 1. Interview with
Page 266 and 267: 37. Simon Flexner to Bernard Flexne
Page 268 and 269: 71. Riefler to Flexner, 3/13/36. Ay
Page 270 and 271: country for classical hwnistic stud
Page 272 and 273: notions formed on the basis of defe
Page 274 and 275: mising.> His great vzlue to Fleer w
Page 276 and 277: lish nev objectives, say, in kerica
Page 278 and 279: In its tone this was less an outlin
Page 280 and 281: \ '. -\ would be imnaterial, provid
Page 282 and 283: Princeton: - The cooperation.. .fie
Page 284 and 285: eplied that he saw little llklihood
Page 286 and 287: and the burranities was clear. As h
Page 288 and 289: and unhealthful. He wanted to retur
Page 290 and 291: term of the concession (1937-19431,
Page 292 and 293:
Princeton. At that p~ss Flexner ste
Page 294 and 295:
too old to accumulate them at Teach
Page 296 and 297:
sorPanofsky was at McCarmick H all,
Page 298 and 299:
concessions to the De~rtment as did
Page 300 and 301:
In 1936, he decided ta seek a lump
Page 302 and 303:
Apparently the Director decided tha
Page 304 and 305:
and after the most careful scrutiny
Page 306 and 307:
of the Institute depends solely and
Page 308 and 309:
to be such .that studies.. .will be
Page 310 and 311:
CHASTER Vf - Notes I. Fosdick, op.
Page 312 and 313:
34. Vekien to Flexner, 11/5/36. Fle
Page 314 and 315:
CWTER VIf TOO MANY GENERALS The est
Page 316 and 317:
General Education Board in 1925 to
Page 318 and 319:
and how helpful I am sure he is goi
Page 320 and 321:
order of business only a brief stet
Page 322 and 323:
. of the Trustees concurred. They k
Page 324 and 325:
From the time of his conversation w
Page 326 and 327:
-317- with rrembers on behalf of th
Page 328 and 329:
sites. Flexner'a reply was courteou
Page 330 and 331:
near the apposite University depart
Page 332 and 333:
The experiment of cooperating with
Page 334 and 335:
On the same day he wrote to Mr. Bam
Page 336 and 337:
was out of the question. To complet
Page 338 and 339:
As the proposal for the first build
Page 340 and 341:
mathematic stipends w wld better be
Page 342 and 343:
than it was uorth, and the Universi
Page 344 and 345:
joint basis. The Departrrrent agree
Page 346 and 347:
outine matter..,The vzrious univers
Page 348 and 349:
and inviting then, since he ves the
Page 350 and 351:
professors in the School of Mathema
Page 352 and 353:
were faculties entirely self-govern
Page 354 and 355:
sthndards he discussed with Profess
Page 356 and 357:
The Director did not consult the fa
Page 358 and 359:
one group for the trustees, the oth
Page 360 and 361:
continue to suggest the names of li
Page 362 and 363:
the conferences ended as Professors
Page 364 and 365:
k t US get our minds so full of the
Page 366 and 367:
leased. The Institute would advznce
Page 368 and 369:
to protect funds from the faculty,
Page 370 and 371:
6. Maass to Flexner, 7J10/33. 7. In
Page 372 and 373:
46, Flexner to Peblen, 12/4/36. 47.
Page 374:
84. Minutes, Trustees' meeting, 1/2
show all

Part 1 - The Institute Libraries - Institute for Advanced Study

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?