05.08.2013 Views

cranfield university mahadi abd murad an integrated structural ...

cranfield university mahadi abd murad an integrated structural ...

cranfield university mahadi abd murad an integrated structural ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LIST OF FIGURES<br />

Figure 1.1: Summary of Pipeline Integrity M<strong>an</strong>agement programme.............................. 2<br />

Figure 1.2: The Methodology of Integrated Pipeline Repair System ............................... 5<br />

Figure 2.1: Surface fracture due to fatigue (Brenn<strong>an</strong> et al., 2007) ................................. 10<br />

Figure 2.2: Reported interest in defect types (Fixter <strong>an</strong>d Williamson, 2006) ................ 11<br />

Figure 2.3: Excessive corrosion occurs on the surface of refinery pipeline ................... 12<br />

Figure 2.4: Dent damage caused by v<strong>an</strong>dalism (Left) <strong>an</strong>d failure due to dent (Right)<br />

(Bruno, 2008) ......................................................................................................... 13<br />

Figure 2.5: Back-scattered micrographs of the influence of time <strong>an</strong>d precipitation in<br />

deformed gauge portions of specimens for hot extruded type 316 stainless steel<br />

piping (Harada et al., 1999) .................................................................................... 14<br />

Figure 2.6: Stress life curve <strong>an</strong>d SIMdex limit setting after 130 000 cycles on a log<br />

scale (De Leeuw <strong>an</strong>d Brenn<strong>an</strong>, 2009) ..................................................................... 20<br />

Figure 2.7: An example of integrity m<strong>an</strong>agement from comparison of pipeline failure<br />

probability with target reliability levels - Benefits of conducting repairs (Hallen et<br />

al., 2003) ................................................................................................................. 22<br />

Figure 2.8: An example of integrity m<strong>an</strong>agement from comparison of pipeline failure<br />

probability with target reliability levels - Relationship between repairs, corrosion<br />

rate, operating pressure <strong>an</strong>d pipeline‘s safe remaining life (Hallen et al., 2003) ... 22<br />

Figure 2.9: Pipeline failure probability with time. Effect of repairs on safe working life<br />

(time to next inspection) <strong>an</strong>d re-inspection intervals (Hallen et al., 2003) ............ 23<br />

Figure 2.10: POD Modular Methodology (Smith et al., 2004) .................................... 235<br />

Figure 2.11: Photos of (left) test set-up reinforcement sleeves applied over stress<br />

corrosion cracking, <strong>an</strong>d (right) Opened stress corrosion crack (black region) which<br />

had extended with fatigue (Linton, 2008) .............................................................. 29<br />

Figure 2.12: Design curves for Technowrap 2K (Frost, 2009) ...................................... 31<br />

Figure 2.13: Design pressure as a function of repair thickness <strong>an</strong>d repair lifetime (Frost,<br />

2009) ..................................................................................................................... 323<br />

Figure 2.14: Integrated Structural Health Monitoring Approach (Herszberg et al., 2007)<br />

................................................................................................................................ 36<br />

Figure 2.15: Graph of the sensing SMARTape (Left), SMARTape on the gas pipeline<br />

(Right) (Inaudi <strong>an</strong>d Glisic, 2005) ........................................................................... 37<br />

Figure 2.16: Application fields <strong>an</strong>d market share forecast of distributed fibre optic<br />

sensors (Ecke, 2008) ............................................................................................... 39<br />

Figure 2.17: Conversion from a circumferential crack to a semi-elliptical crack<br />

(Wallbrink et al., 2005) .......................................................................................... 46<br />

Figure 2.18: Mesh <strong>an</strong>d geometry. Θ is the <strong>an</strong>gle associated with the hoop stress, t is wall<br />

thickness, d is notch depth <strong>an</strong>d ρ is notch radius (De Carvalho, 2005) .................. 48<br />

Figure 2.19: A pipe with local wall thinning, subject to internal pressure P <strong>an</strong>d bending<br />

M. Rm Mid thickness radius, Θ is the <strong>an</strong>gle associated with the hoop stress, t is the<br />

thickness, Di is the internal diameter, d is the notch depth <strong>an</strong>d l is the notch length<br />

(Kim <strong>an</strong>d Son, 2004) .............................................................................................. 48<br />

Figure 2.20: Photos of repaired pipeline using composite wraps based on Clock Spring<br />

(CLOCK SPRING Comp<strong>an</strong>y L.P., 2005) .............................................................. 52<br />

Figure 2.21: The current scenario of research study in the composite repair ................. 54<br />

xiii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!