cranfield university mahadi abd murad an integrated structural ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

1) Electrical Insulation Test Results (Strain gauge type CEA-06-120CZ-120) Location and Position (on steel pipe – 120 Ohm) 1% (actual) 1% (Manufacturer‘s spec) 230 Leakage to Ground S1 S1a1 -0.12 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm S1a2 -0.02 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm S123 -0.08 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm S2 S1b1 -0.2 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm S1b2 +0.1 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm S1b3 -0.24 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm S3 S1c1 +0.1 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm S1c2 -0.04 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm S1c3 -0.03 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm S4 S21 -0.06 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm S22 -0.04 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm S23 -0.26 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm S5 S31 -0.12 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm S32 -0.06 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm S33 -0.14 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm S6 Sd1 -0.24 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm Sd2 -0.06 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm Sd3 -0.06 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm
2) Electrical Insulation Test Results (Strain gauge type CEA-06-250UR-350) Location and Position (on composite – 350 Ohm) 1% (actual) 1% (Manufacturer‘s spec) 231 Leakage to Ground C1 C1a1 -0.2 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm C1a2 +0.02 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm C123 -0.06 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm C2 C2b1 -0.08 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm C2b2 +0.09 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm C2b3 +0.1 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm C3 C3c1 +0.03 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm C3c2 -0.03 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm C3c3 -0.24 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm C4 C4d1 -0.04 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm C4d2 -0.06 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm C4d3 -0.15 % ± 0.4% >20 GOhm
Page 1:
CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY MAHADI ABD MUR
Page 4 and 5:
ABSTRACT One of the most common pro
Page 7 and 8:
TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........
Page 9 and 10:
3.7.1 Introduction ................
Page 11:
5.6 Summary and Conclusions .......
Page 14 and 15:
Figure 3.1: Schematic diagram of th
Page 16 and 17:
Figure 5.4: The average temperature
Page 18 and 19:
NOMENCLATURES ACFM Alternating Curr
Page 21 and 22:
1 INTRODUCTION One of the most comm
Page 23 and 24:
1.1 Objectives Knowing this backgro
Page 25 and 26:
The methodology of this integrated
Page 27 and 28:
Chapter 6 contains the summary and
Page 29 and 30:
period of the major part of the exi
Page 31 and 32:
Figure 2.2: Reported interest in de
Page 33 and 34:
Figure 2.4: Dent damage caused by v
Page 35 and 36:
presented current practices, recent
Page 37 and 38:
Energy Workforce Sdn Bhd (2011) cla
Page 39 and 40:
available provides real time detect
Page 41 and 42:
2.3.3 Reliability Analysis of Infor
Page 43 and 44:
Figure 2.9: Pipeline failure probab
Page 45 and 46:
2.3.3.1 NDT Reliability and POD cur
Page 47 and 48:
increase in the yield limit of stee
Page 49 and 50:
the SCC assessment in their integri
Page 51 and 52:
Manufacturers such as Walkers Techn
Page 53 and 54:
Company L.P, 2005); Aquawrap ® pro
Page 55 and 56:
monitoring, inspection, and damage
Page 57 and 58:
2.6.2 Aims of Structural Health Mon
Page 59 and 60:
Figure 2.16: Application fields and
Page 61 and 62:
egistered by the piezoelectric sens
Page 63 and 64:
discretization error. Round-off err
Page 65 and 66:
notches and Neuber‘s is better fo
Page 67 and 68:
maximum local stress at discontinui
Page 69 and 70:
De Carvalho (2005) concludes that t
Page 71 and 72:
accurate simulation of loading espe
Page 73 and 74:
Based on the above facts, the opera
Page 75 and 76:
3 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS (FEA) IN
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 3.2: Schematic diagram of th
Page 79 and 80:
In this modelling work (i.e. compos
Page 81 and 82:
This partition toolset also helps u
Page 83 and 84:
Figure 3.6: Mesh control using Swee
Page 85 and 86:
Figure 3.7: Schematic representatio
Page 87 and 88:
discretization. Therefore, in this
Page 89 and 90:
According to Staten et al. (2010b),
Page 91 and 92:
3.5 The influence of pressure on th
Page 93 and 94:
each pressure value remains constan
Page 95 and 96:
Axial Stress, σa (S22) was referre
Page 97 and 98:
Figure 3.14 shows a graph of analyt
Page 99 and 100:
the notch defect is found to be in
Page 101 and 102:
One of the contributions of this st
Page 103 and 104:
Table 3.4: Convergence tests on var
Page 105 and 106:
Figures 3.16 and 3.17 show that the
Page 107 and 108:
Figure 3.20 shows that as the relat
Page 109 and 110:
3.7.4 Concluding Remarks A biaxial
Page 111 and 112:
yarns change and lateral contact be
Page 113 and 114:
For predicting E2 and Gl2, a number
Page 115 and 116:
Where: Ar = weight of one sheet of
Page 117 and 118:
Where; The Stiffness matrix is trad
Page 119 and 120:
simulations for the hoop strain at
Page 121 and 122:
Figure 3.24: Finding the hoop stres
Page 123 and 124:
Table 3.8: The effect of repair len
Page 125 and 126:
four up to 18 layers. In this study
Page 127 and 128:
hoop and axial stress concentration
Page 129 and 130:
Table 3.11: Predicted Elastic Const
Page 131 and 132:
Table 3.13: Axial Stress v/s L/W ra
Page 133 and 134:
Hoop Stress (MPa) Figure 3.3: Hoop
Page 135 and 136:
However, Frost (2008) and Alexander
Page 137 and 138:
Table 3.17: Ratio of Axial Stress N
Page 139 and 140:
axial load (e.g. buried pipelines t
Page 141 and 142:
3.10 Numerical Strain Analysis of C
Page 143 and 144:
Figure 3.36 shows the contours befo
Page 145 and 146:
Stress Concentration Factor 2 1.8 1
Page 147 and 148:
In fact, for Notch 40 with 18 plies
Page 149 and 150:
this second approach (i.e. the expe
Page 151 and 152:
4.2.2 Strain Gauge Selection and Cr
Page 153 and 154:
Finally, a method used to calculate
Page 155 and 156:
Where, and are the maximum and mini
Page 157 and 158:
should be between 20 and 28 bar and
Page 159 and 160:
welded weld neck flange at both end
Page 161 and 162:
Figure 4.7: Sensor and heating elem
Page 163 and 164:
Figure 4.9: A summary of data acqui
Page 165 and 166:
One of the objectives of doing this
Page 167 and 168:
Figure 4.14: A schematic diagram of
Page 169 and 170:
Table 4.1: Strain gauge readings at
Page 171 and 172:
microstrain 3.00E-04 2.50E-04 2.00E
Page 173 and 174:
However, the axial load transfer is
Page 175 and 176:
Mircostrain 500 450 400 350 300 250
Page 177 and 178:
Since the defect is not a flat notc
Page 179 and 180:
Again, the epoxy resin plays a sign
Page 181 and 182:
Table 4.4: Study at the defect area
Page 183 and 184:
Mircostrain 300 250 200 150 100 50
Page 185 and 186:
Mircostrain 600 500 400 300 200 100
Page 187 and 188:
14.25% in hoop strain and 23.5% in
Page 189 and 190:
consideration for the selection of
Page 191 and 192:
5.4 Methodology of Thermal Expansio
Page 193 and 194:
Figure 5.1: Some preventive measure
Page 195 and 196:
5.4.1 The Fundamentals of the Therm
Page 197 and 198:
5.5 Analysis of Results 5.5.1 The t
Page 199 and 200: Thermal Output (strain ) 0.0002 0.0
Page 201 and 202: (Strain ,ε) Figure 5.12: Coefficie
Page 203 and 204: (Strain ,ε) 0.0002 0.00018 0.00016
Page 205 and 206: Table 5.1: The strain readings afte
Page 207 and 208: maximum shear strain increase as th
Page 209 and 210: The above results show that shear s
Page 211 and 212: shear strains becomes more stable a
Page 213 and 214: for future safe design and operatio
Page 215 and 216: has been fully cured. Poor surface
Page 217 and 218: 6.3 Primary PhD Achievements The ea
Page 219 and 220: In Chapter 5, the CTE was determine
Page 221 and 222: ASM International (2002), "Thermal
Page 223 and 224: Bucinell, R. B. (2001), Calculating
Page 225 and 226: Proceedings of OMAE'01 20th Interna
Page 227 and 228: Greenwood, R. (2002), UKOPA Pipelin
Page 229 and 230: Kotrechko, S. A., Krasovskii, A. Y.
Page 231 and 232: Mousavi, S. E., Xiao, H. and Sukuma
Page 233 and 234: Raju, I. S. and Newman, J. C. (1986
Page 235 and 236: Tennyson, R. C. and Mufti, A. A. (2
Page 237 and 238: Xue, L., Widera, G. E. O. and Sang,
Page 239 and 240: General Technical Specifications: T
Page 241 and 242: Photos of the Design and Build of t
Page 243 and 244: Composite Installation Process usin
Page 245 and 246: APPENDIX 3 - STRAIN GAUGE INSTALLAT
Page 247 and 248: Figure 7: Mylar tape was stuck onto
Page 249: Figure 19: Repeating the above proc
show all

cranfield university mahadi abd murad an integrated structural ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?