05.08.2013 Views

cranfield university mahadi abd murad an integrated structural ...

cranfield university mahadi abd murad an integrated structural ...

cranfield university mahadi abd murad an integrated structural ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

One of the objectives of doing this was to validate the numerical stress<br />

concentration results. The same procedures were repeated in the second stage of Test 1<br />

but this time the main objective was to observe how well the strains <strong>an</strong>d stresses in the<br />

composite follow the strains <strong>an</strong>d stresses in the pipe due to internal pressure loading.<br />

Hence, it would provide some insights into load tr<strong>an</strong>sfer between steel <strong>an</strong>d composite<br />

<strong>an</strong>d the stress tr<strong>an</strong>sfer through the epoxy matrix. A detailed description of the strain<br />

measurement methodology will be explained in the following section.<br />

4.4.2 Detailed descriptions of strain measurement<br />

Figures 4.12 <strong>an</strong>d 4.13 show there were three locations of strain measurement<br />

(i.e. at base, middle <strong>an</strong>d top or outer layer of the composite repair). Points 1a, b <strong>an</strong>d c<br />

were referred to the points on the steel pipe (i.e. base). At point 1a (i.e. at the notch<br />

root), there were three strain gauges installed along the circumferential notch root as<br />

shown in Figure 4.14. Points 2a <strong>an</strong>d b were referred to the 4 th layer of the composite<br />

lamina (half of the composite thickness – middle layer) <strong>an</strong>d Point 3a <strong>an</strong>d b were referred<br />

to the outer layer (8 th layer – top layer) of the composite. The measuring dist<strong>an</strong>ce of<br />

strain gauge from the point away from the defect (nominal thickness) to the defect area<br />

on each layer was about 80 ~ 90 mm.<br />

Figure 4.82: A schematic representation of the measuring point locations<br />

145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!