10.08.2013 Views

Le financement des soins infirmiers à domicile en Belgique - KCE

Le financement des soins infirmiers à domicile en Belgique - KCE

Le financement des soins infirmiers à domicile en Belgique - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

34 Financing of Home Nursing <strong>KCE</strong> reports 122<br />

Each item is scored on a four level ordinal scale (1 = indep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>t 2 = moderately<br />

dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>t 3 = severely dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>t 4 = totally dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>t). A pati<strong>en</strong>t is considered as<br />

dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>t if he/she gets a score of 3 for the item. The combination of these scores<br />

leads to an assessm<strong>en</strong>t of the dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy level of the pati<strong>en</strong>t (see supra):<br />

• baseline level (no dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy or low dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy level);<br />

• level A (dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy for bathing, dressing and transfer or toileting);<br />

• level B (dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy for bathing, dressing, transfer, toileting and contin<strong>en</strong>ce<br />

or eating);<br />

• level C (the highest score for at least five functions, except contin<strong>en</strong>ce or<br />

eating, which may have a score 3). For that category, the nurse is obliged to<br />

make at least two visits a day.<br />

Interpretation guidelines are published on the NIHDI website and are used to control<br />

the nurse’s assessm<strong>en</strong>t of the dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>t person by the medical advisors of the social<br />

insurance ag<strong>en</strong>cies..<br />

Each dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>ce level gives an all-in price for a day care. In 2009 these prices are:<br />

Dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>ce Day price during Day price during<br />

category the week the week-<strong>en</strong>d<br />

A € 15.15 €22.61<br />

B € 29.19 €43.34<br />

C €39.93 €59.47<br />

Validity<br />

A cont<strong>en</strong>t validity analysis 38 shows that this scale only assesses dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy for Activities<br />

in Daily Living (ADL) and does not assess the dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy for instrum<strong>en</strong>tal activities<br />

(managem<strong>en</strong>t, cooking, house holding, shopping, transport using, etc.) in daily living<br />

(IADL). It focuses on incapacities and does not meet the ICF approach proposed by the<br />

World Health Organisation International Classification of Functioning (ICF). Construct<br />

validity is good: concurr<strong>en</strong>t validity with the AGGIR scale is high (r²=0.89) and the scale<br />

is correlated with the time sp<strong>en</strong>t for care for ADL (r² = 0.65). Cronbach alpha<br />

coeffici<strong>en</strong>t is higher than 0.9. Test-retest and external reliability are good (coeffici<strong>en</strong>t<br />

kappa >0.7).The mean time for care is significantly differ<strong>en</strong>t in each group -A, B and C-<br />

(ANOVA and Games-Howel post-hoc test.)<br />

Falez (2006) 38 found that the median required time for daily care for ADL is 229<br />

minutes for category C, 200 for category B and 145 for category A. The scale is subject<br />

to a ceiling effect and underestimates high dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy levels wh<strong>en</strong> compared with the<br />

AGGIR scale: the highest dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy category measured with this last scale needs a<br />

median time for care of 240 min. It also seems to be subject to a “lower limit” effect,<br />

neglecting lowest dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy levels wh<strong>en</strong> compared with the AGGIR scale.<br />

Applicability for financing purposes<br />

Falez (2006) 38 conclu<strong>des</strong> that the scale is quite valid, since its construct validity is linked<br />

with old concepts (incapacities in place of performance) and could theoretically be used<br />

for a funding adapted to case mix of home nursing, because of the good correlation with<br />

the workload. The Interface study (2005) 39 reported face validity of the scale used in<br />

nursing homes. For the caregivers, this scale gets an incomplete vision of the pati<strong>en</strong>t and<br />

does not give suffici<strong>en</strong>t information for care planning. The advantage of this instrum<strong>en</strong>t<br />

is that it is curr<strong>en</strong>tly used by nurses. All caregivers are familiar with this scale, which<br />

would not imply modifications (which imply learning) for them.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!