Le financement des soins infirmiers à domicile en Belgique - KCE
Le financement des soins infirmiers à domicile en Belgique - KCE
Le financement des soins infirmiers à domicile en Belgique - KCE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
40 Financing of Home Nursing <strong>KCE</strong> reports 122<br />
4.2.1.5 The Functional Autonomy Measurem<strong>en</strong>t System<br />
Description<br />
The SMAF (Système de Mesure de l’Autonomie Fonctionnelle) was developed in<br />
Quebec in 1982. Data used to develop this system came from a sample of 1 977 old<br />
people with autonomy troubles, in differ<strong>en</strong>t contexts (at home and in long term<br />
institutions). Clinical evaluations and cost evaluations were performed. The SMAF<br />
creates groups of pati<strong>en</strong>ts using their characteristics and not using care delivered. The<br />
SMAF evaluates how the person performs 29 functions covering ADL (7 items), mobility<br />
(6 items), communication (3 items), m<strong>en</strong>tal functions (5 items) and IADL (8 items). Each<br />
function is scored on an ordinal way: 0 (indep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>t), - 0.5 (with difficulty), -1 (with<br />
supervision), -2 (with help), -3 (dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>t). The items allow capturing disabilities<br />
related to interaction betwe<strong>en</strong> individuals and their <strong>en</strong>vironm<strong>en</strong>ts and meet the<br />
approach of ICF.<br />
It takes about 20 to 30 minutes to assess the pati<strong>en</strong>t with the instrum<strong>en</strong>t. The scale<br />
exists in differ<strong>en</strong>t versions (English, Fr<strong>en</strong>ch and Dutch). A combined Statistical analysis<br />
(using Ward asc<strong>en</strong>ding classification and the K-means non-hierarchical partitioning<br />
method) with advice from a panel of experts lead to the id<strong>en</strong>tification of 14<br />
homog<strong>en</strong>eous disability profiles (iso-SMAF) characterised by a gradual progression in<br />
severity of disabilities in IADL and ADL accompanied by predominant limitations either<br />
in mobility or m<strong>en</strong>tal functions. These 14 profiles could be classified in 5 categories.<br />
Category 1 classifies persons with IADL problems (iso-SMAF 1, 2 and 3). Category 2<br />
classifies persons with predominant troubles for mobility (iso-SMAF 4, 6 and 9.)<br />
Category 3 classifies persons with predominant m<strong>en</strong>tal disorder (iso-SMAF 5, 7, 8 and<br />
10.) Category 4 classifies persons with m<strong>en</strong>tal and mobility disorders needing help for<br />
mobility. Category 5 classifies bedridd<strong>en</strong> persons with severe m<strong>en</strong>tal disorder.<br />
The care time needed varies from 0.39 hour up to 4.07 hours a day. Some iso-SMAF<br />
profiles need care time that are not statistically differ<strong>en</strong>t (1-2, 3-4, 7-8, 9-10, 11-12) but<br />
they differ in the type of services needed.<br />
Validity<br />
Dubuc et al. (2006) 44 <strong>des</strong>cribed the method used to create and validate the Iso-SMAF<br />
classification. Stability of the classification was assessed with the “split sample” cross<br />
validation method. Reproducibility was assessed by using another cluster analysis<br />
method. The predictive validity was assessed by the ability of the classification to predict<br />
pati<strong>en</strong>ts’ required hours of nursing care. Homog<strong>en</strong>eity was evaluated by the coeffici<strong>en</strong>t<br />
of variation. Heterog<strong>en</strong>eity across profiles was assessed with t-test or Wilcoxon rank<br />
test. Cont<strong>en</strong>t validity was established by a combination of Delphi method and nominal<br />
group technique.<br />
The results showed a good stability and reproducibility with a good kappa coeffici<strong>en</strong>t<br />
obtained with the cross-validation (K= 0.67) and same cluster structures id<strong>en</strong>tified<br />
wh<strong>en</strong> using differ<strong>en</strong>t methods. The 14 iso-SMAF classification explained 82% of the<br />
variance in nursing care time and 80% of their costs. Coeffici<strong>en</strong>ts of variation were all<br />
less than 0.5 44 .