13.08.2013 Views

Environmental Assessment

Environmental Assessment

Environmental Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES CHAPTER 3<br />

maintenance program that repairs and corrects erosion problems and damage, and implements diligent<br />

monitoring of activities for resource damage and unauthorized use of undisturbed areas (Scenic Resources<br />

Report page 6).<br />

Grazing, including the construction or reconstruction of improvements, would have no measurable<br />

cumulative or cumulatively significant effects on scenic resources under any of the three alternatives.<br />

None of the other current, on-going or reasonable and foreseeable actions has any identified cumulative<br />

effects on scenic resources under any of the three alternatives.<br />

Soils<br />

Introduction<br />

The long-term sustainability of forest ecosystems depends on the productivity and hydrologic functioning<br />

of soils. Ground-disturbing management activities directly affect soil properties, which may adversely<br />

change the natural capability of soils and their potential responses to use and management. A detrimental<br />

soil condition often occurs where heavy equipment or logs displace surface organic layers or reduce soil<br />

porosity through compaction. Detrimental disturbances reduce the soils ability to supply nutrients,<br />

moisture, and air that support soil microorganisms and the growth of vegetation. The biological<br />

productivity of soils relates to the amount of surface organic matter and coarse woody debris retained or<br />

removed from affected sites.<br />

Forest soils are considered as a non-renewable resource, as measured by human life spans, and<br />

maintenance or enhancement of soil productivity is an integral part of National Forest management.<br />

Therefore, an evaluation of the potential effects on soil productivity is essential for integrated<br />

management of forest resources (Soils Report page 4).<br />

Existing Condition – Landscape Characteristics<br />

Approximately 70 percent of the planning area is comprised of gently sloping plains and uneven lava<br />

flows that surround Pine Mountain, a composite volcano. Pine Mountain and its associated landtypes<br />

comprise another approximately 20 percent. The remaining 10 percent is associated with miscellaneous<br />

landtypes (cinder cones, buttes and escarpments) that occur in scattered locations in the planning area.<br />

Slopes generally range from 0 to 30 percent on the dominant landforms. Steeper slopes (30 to 70 percent)<br />

are associated with the smooth-to-moderately dissected side slopes of Pine Mountain, escarpments of<br />

buttes and ridges, and a few scattered cinder cones (Soils Report page 6).<br />

Most of the water yielded from these lands is delivered to streams as deep seepage and subsurface flows.<br />

Surface runoff generally occurs only in areas with shallow soils and disturbed sites during high intensity<br />

storms or when the ground is frozen. There are no perennial or intermittent streams within the planning<br />

area. Any channeled surface flows within ephemeral channels are discontinuous and of short duration.<br />

With the exception of the youngest lava flows, over 90 percent of the planning area has been covered by a<br />

moderately thick layer of volcanic ash and pumice from the Mount Mazama and Newberry volcanic<br />

eruptions. These deposits consist mostly of sand-sized particles (Soils Report page 6).<br />

Dominant soils are moderately deep (20 to 40 inches) to deep (greater than 40 inches) with loamy-sand<br />

textures and have moderate productivity potential for the growth of vegetation. The locations of<br />

proposed activity areas meet criteria for land suitability that would allow them to be regenerated or resist<br />

irreversible resource damage.<br />

Soils derived from volcanic ash tend to be non-cohesive (loose) and have very little structural<br />

development due to the young geologic age of the ash deposits. These ash-influenced soils have naturally<br />

3-91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!