Environmental Assessment
Environmental Assessment
Environmental Assessment
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES CHAPTER 3<br />
down log information was obtainable from the stand exam data because the stand exams did not collect<br />
that information. Given that the snag levels recorded by the stand exams were significantly below desired<br />
conditions, and since snags eventually become down wood habitat, it is likely and predictable that down<br />
wood habitat is also below desired condition, especially in the long-term.<br />
Green tree replacements (GTRs) provide future snags and ultimately future down logs. They were<br />
determined to be not a major issue within the planning area. All coniferous stands have fully stocked<br />
overstory. This may become a problem at some point in the future in existing black bark ponderosa pine<br />
stands with heavy canopy cover because of a general lack of understory regeneration.<br />
Cumulative Effects – There are no identified cumulative or cumulatively significant effects associated<br />
with any of the current, on-going, or reasonably foreseeable actions in conjunction with any of the three<br />
alternatives in this analysis. Current levels of snags are generally below desired levels across the<br />
landscape. Recent management activities in Fuzzy and Aspen and planned activities in the Lava Cast<br />
planning area have or will implement actions that would over time, increase the number and distribution<br />
of snags across the landscape. These actions are also expected to result in larger diameter snags due to<br />
increased growth rates associated with both thinning and the use of prescribe fire in forested areas.<br />
It is unlikely that funding to implement the creation of additional snags would be available under either of<br />
the action alternatives. Therefore, there would be no measurable cumulative effects under any of the<br />
three alternatives.<br />
Past, current, and planned actions are also expected to result in increases in the quantity, quality, and<br />
distribution of CWM across the landscape for the same reasons. Realization of these objectives would<br />
take somewhat longer than that for snags<br />
All management activities, past, current, and planned, incorporate GTR objectives which provide future<br />
sources of snag and CWM and are expected, over time to result in levels of both snags and CWM that<br />
more closely approximately historic levels across the landscape.<br />
Special/Unique Habitats – The planning area has no wet meadows, aquatic / riparian habitats, or talus<br />
slopes. There are also no permanent water bodies, including lakes, ponds, rivers or streams with the<br />
planning area boundaries.<br />
There is one cave, Lavacicle, in the southern portion of the planning area. It is a large cave with a length<br />
of 3,500 feet. Due to past vandalism which has caused considerable damage to the stalagmites in the<br />
cave, it is gated to prevent non-designated entry. No data has been found in the District's records on bat<br />
occupancy of the cave. The current entrance has also been vandalized making entry by wildlife very<br />
difficult.<br />
There are several cliffs and rock outcrops within the planning area that provide potential habitat for<br />
golden eagles, prairie falcons, ravens, bobcat, mountain lion, bats, and other species.<br />
There are six man-made guzzlers/trick tanks in the planning area. These provide critical water sources for<br />
wildlife. These are augmented during periods of grazing by numerous water sets and water troughs (Sand<br />
Springs pasture only).<br />
Forested lavas also occur in the planning area. These areas provide a combination of rock and vegetation<br />
for wildlife. The ecotones between these areas and adjacent habitats are also valuable.<br />
3-160