13.08.2013 Views

Environmental Assessment

Environmental Assessment

Environmental Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES CHAPTER 3<br />

contain regeneration. Xeric shrublands do not provide hiding cover as currently defined. Areas of tall<br />

shrubs do provide camouflage cover, especially in areas of rolling topography.<br />

Tables 3-8 and 3-9 display the effects of proposed vegetation and fuel reduction treatments on hiding<br />

cover under each of the action alternatives. Table 3-8, displays the effects across the entire planning<br />

area.<br />

Table 3-8 Effects of Fuel Reduction and Vegetation Treatments on Planning Area Wide Deer Hiding Cover Acres<br />

Hiding<br />

Cover<br />

Quality<br />

Fuel<br />

Treatmen<br />

t<br />

Prescripti<br />

on<br />

Veg<br />

Treatmen<br />

t<br />

Prescripti<br />

on<br />

Hiding<br />

Cover<br />

(Gross<br />

Acres)<br />

36<br />

Alternative 2 Alternative 3<br />

Net<br />

Reducti<br />

on w /<br />

10%<br />

Retentio<br />

n (Net<br />

Acres)<br />

3-13<br />

Acres<br />

Convert<br />

ed to<br />

Other<br />

Type<br />

(Gross /<br />

Net<br />

Acres)<br />

Hiding<br />

Cover<br />

(Gross<br />

Acres)<br />

36<br />

Net<br />

Reducti<br />

on w /<br />

20%<br />

Retentio<br />

n (Net<br />

Acres)<br />

Acres<br />

Convert<br />

ed to<br />

Other<br />

Type<br />

(Gross /<br />

Net<br />

Acres)<br />

Good -- MTT 508 457 -- 442 354 --<br />

Good -- STT 125 113 -- 213 97 --<br />

Good Burn -- 21 --<br />

21 / 11<br />

marginal<br />

10 --<br />

10 / 6 /<br />

marginal<br />

Good Burn MTT -- -- -- 7 6 --<br />

Good Burn STT -- -- -- 13 10 --<br />

Good<br />

Pre-Treat,<br />

Burn<br />

-- 255 229 -- 298 239 --<br />

Good<br />

Pre-Treat,<br />

Burn<br />

MTT 902 812 -- 347 278 --<br />

Good<br />

Pre-Treat,<br />

Burn<br />

STT 637 573 -- 1,142 914 --<br />

Good<br />

Pre-Treat,<br />

Mow<br />

-- 8 7 -- 4 3 --<br />

Good<br />

Pre-Treat,<br />

Mow<br />

MTT 17 15 -- 9 7 --<br />

Good<br />

Pre-Treat,<br />

Mow<br />

STT 6 2 -- 18 14 --<br />

Marginal -- MTT 407 184 -- 505 195 --<br />

Marginal -- STT 156 70 -- 196 79 --<br />

Marginal Burn -- 388 194 -- 116 47 --<br />

Marginal Burn MTT 125 57 -- 109 44 --<br />

Marginal Burn STT 81 37 -- 143 58 --<br />

Marginal<br />

Pre-Treat,<br />

Burn<br />

-- 612 275 -- 480 192 --<br />

Marginal<br />

Pre-Treat,<br />

Burn<br />

MTT 357 161 -- 698 160 --<br />

Marginal<br />

Pre-Treat,<br />

Burn<br />

STT 392 176 -- 416 187 --<br />

Marginal Mow -- -- -- -- 28 0 --<br />

Marginal<br />

Pre-Treat,<br />

Mow<br />

-- 43 20 -- 28 12 --<br />

Marginal<br />

Pre-Treat,<br />

Mow<br />

MTT 15 7 -- 18 8 --<br />

Marginal<br />

Pre-Treat,<br />

Mow<br />

STT 5 3 -- 16 7 --<br />

36 Hiding cover acres under both action alternatives reflect the number of cover acres within treatment units only. Total<br />

estimated existing number of acres of good or marginal hiding cover is estimated at approximately 5,627 acres. Alternative 2<br />

does not have activities prescribed in approximately 570 acres of existing cover; Alternative 3 does not treat approximately 724<br />

acres of existing cover.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!