13.08.2013 Views

Environmental Assessment

Environmental Assessment

Environmental Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTRODUCTION – AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT CHAPTER 3<br />

& ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES<br />

CHAPTER 3 - EXISTING CONDITION & ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

CONSEQUENCES_____________________<br />

This section provides the scientific and analytical basis for alternative comparison. This section describes<br />

the beneficial or adverse impacts to the environment that would occur if the various alternatives were<br />

implemented. Probable effects are discussed in terms of environmental changes from the current<br />

condition and include qualitative as well as quantitative assessments of direct, indirect, and cumulative<br />

effects.<br />

Effects (or impacts) are defined as follows:<br />

Direct effects: Those that occur at the same time and in the same general location as the activity causing<br />

the effects.<br />

Indirect effects: Those that occur at a different time or different location than the activity to which the<br />

effects are related.<br />

Cumulative effects: – Those that result from the incremental impact of the action when added to other<br />

past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions. Unless otherwise noted, the boundary for the<br />

area for cumulative effects for all resources is generally the planning area boundary. Depending on the<br />

resource area, there may be multiple analysis area boundaries of differing sizes and include areas within<br />

and outside of the planning area boundaries.<br />

The information contained in this section regarding the effects of the proposed actions under each<br />

alternative is summarized from the following specialist reports: Wildlife (including Threatened,<br />

Endangered, and Sensitive species), Range, Recreation, Silviculture, Fire and Fuels, Heritage Resources,<br />

Soils, Botany including noxious weeds, and Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV). Additional and more detailed<br />

information regarding the existing condition and supporting documentation can be found in those reports<br />

or the project file at the Bend-Fort Rock Ranger District office. All quantities, including but not limited<br />

to acreages, distances, and volumes, are approximate.<br />

This chapter summarizes the physical, biological, social, and economic environments of the project area<br />

and the anticipated effects of implementing each alternative on that environment.<br />

“Existing Condition” refers to the existing biological, physical and social conditions of an area that are<br />

subject to change directly, indirectly, or cumulatively as a result of a proposed human action. Information<br />

on the existing condition is found in each resource section under “Existing Condition.”<br />

The following discussion of effects follows CEQ guidance for scope (40 CFR 1508.25(c)) by categorizing<br />

them as direct, indirect, and cumulative. The focus is on cause and consequences. Effects exist in a chain<br />

of consequences and thus may be labeled “indirect” (occurring later in time or farther in distance, 40 CFR<br />

1508.8(b)), rather than cumulative. For this analysis, in general, direct and indirect effects have been<br />

discussed in the context that most readers are accustomed to: those consequences which are caused by the<br />

action and either occur at the same time and place, or are later in time or farther removed in distance but<br />

are still reasonably foreseeable (40 CFR 1508.8). Cumulative effects are discussed where there is an<br />

Effect to the environment which results from the incremental effect of the action when added to other<br />

past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future actions (40 CFR 1508.7).<br />

There are basically two methodologies the individual resource subjects use in discussing cumulative<br />

actions and consequences. The first method would be to describe each individual past, present and<br />

reasonably foreseeable action – including mitigation (cataloging). The second would be to “lump”<br />

individual actions if the information regarding those actions would not be useful to illuminate or predict<br />

3–1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!