14.06.2012 Views

Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank

Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank

Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Rating</strong> <strong>Models</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Validation</strong><br />

For the purpose of validating rating models, the condition in the definition of<br />

conditional entropy is the classification in rating class c <strong>and</strong> default event to be<br />

depicted ðDÞ. For each rating class c, the conditional entropy is hc:<br />

hc ¼ fpðDjcÞ log 2 ðpðDjcÞÞ þ ð1 pðDjcÞÞ log 2 ð1 pðDjcÞÞg:<br />

The conditional entropy hc of a rating class thus corresponds to the uncertainty<br />

remaining with regard to the future default status after a case is assigned<br />

to a rating class. Across all rating classes in a model, the conditional entropy H1<br />

(averaged using the observed frequencies of the individual rating classesÕ pc) is<br />

defined as:<br />

H1 ¼ X<br />

c<br />

pc hc:<br />

The average conditional entropy H1 corresponds to the uncertainty remaining<br />

with regard to the future default status after application of the rating model.<br />

Using the entropy H0, which is available without applying the rating model if<br />

the average default probability of the sample is known, it is possible to define<br />

a relative measure of the information gained due to the rating model. The conditional<br />

information entropy ratio (CIER) is defined as: 93<br />

CIER ¼ H0 H1<br />

¼ 1 H1<br />

:<br />

H0<br />

The value CIER can be interpreted as follows:<br />

— If no additional information is gained by applying the rating model, H1 ¼ H0<br />

<strong>and</strong> CIER ¼ 0.<br />

— If the rating model is ideal <strong>and</strong> no uncertainty remains regarding the default<br />

status after the model is applied, H1 ¼ 0 <strong>and</strong> CIER ¼ 1.<br />

The higher the CIER value is, the more information regarding the future<br />

default status is gained from the rating system.<br />

However, it should be noted that information on the properties of the rating<br />

model is lost in the calculation of CIER, as is the case with AUC <strong>and</strong> the other<br />

one-dimensional measures of discriminatory power. As an individual indicator,<br />

therefore, CIER has only limited meaning in the assessment of a rating model.<br />

Chart 66: Entropy-Based Measures of Discriminatory Power for the Data Example<br />

93 The difference ðH0 H1Þ is also referred to as the Kullback-Leibler distance. Therefore, CIER is a st<strong>and</strong>ardized Kullback-<br />

Leibler distance.<br />

114 Guidelines on Credit Risk Management<br />

H0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!