Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank
Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank
Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Rating</strong> <strong>Models</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Validation</strong><br />
For the purpose of validating rating models, the condition in the definition of<br />
conditional entropy is the classification in rating class c <strong>and</strong> default event to be<br />
depicted ðDÞ. For each rating class c, the conditional entropy is hc:<br />
hc ¼ fpðDjcÞ log 2 ðpðDjcÞÞ þ ð1 pðDjcÞÞ log 2 ð1 pðDjcÞÞg:<br />
The conditional entropy hc of a rating class thus corresponds to the uncertainty<br />
remaining with regard to the future default status after a case is assigned<br />
to a rating class. Across all rating classes in a model, the conditional entropy H1<br />
(averaged using the observed frequencies of the individual rating classesÕ pc) is<br />
defined as:<br />
H1 ¼ X<br />
c<br />
pc hc:<br />
The average conditional entropy H1 corresponds to the uncertainty remaining<br />
with regard to the future default status after application of the rating model.<br />
Using the entropy H0, which is available without applying the rating model if<br />
the average default probability of the sample is known, it is possible to define<br />
a relative measure of the information gained due to the rating model. The conditional<br />
information entropy ratio (CIER) is defined as: 93<br />
CIER ¼ H0 H1<br />
¼ 1 H1<br />
:<br />
H0<br />
The value CIER can be interpreted as follows:<br />
— If no additional information is gained by applying the rating model, H1 ¼ H0<br />
<strong>and</strong> CIER ¼ 0.<br />
— If the rating model is ideal <strong>and</strong> no uncertainty remains regarding the default<br />
status after the model is applied, H1 ¼ 0 <strong>and</strong> CIER ¼ 1.<br />
The higher the CIER value is, the more information regarding the future<br />
default status is gained from the rating system.<br />
However, it should be noted that information on the properties of the rating<br />
model is lost in the calculation of CIER, as is the case with AUC <strong>and</strong> the other<br />
one-dimensional measures of discriminatory power. As an individual indicator,<br />
therefore, CIER has only limited meaning in the assessment of a rating model.<br />
Chart 66: Entropy-Based Measures of Discriminatory Power for the Data Example<br />
93 The difference ðH0 H1Þ is also referred to as the Kullback-Leibler distance. Therefore, CIER is a st<strong>and</strong>ardized Kullback-<br />
Leibler distance.<br />
114 Guidelines on Credit Risk Management<br />
H0