14.06.2012 Views

Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank

Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank

Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Rating</strong> <strong>Models</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Validation</strong><br />

In order to ensure plausibility, as many internal <strong>and</strong> external experts as possible<br />

from various professional areas should participate in the development of<br />

stress tests.<br />

Completeness of Risk Factors Included in the Model<br />

Past experience has shown that when crisis situations arise, multiple risk factors<br />

tend to show clearly unfavorable changes at the same time. Comprehensive <strong>and</strong><br />

realistic crisis scenarios will thus include simultaneous changes in all essential<br />

risk factors wherever possible. Stress tests which consider the effects of a change<br />

in only one risk factor (one-factor stress tests) should only be performed as a<br />

complement for the analysis of individual aspects. (For an example of how risk<br />

factors can be categorized, please see chart 78)<br />

Extraordinary Changes in Risk Factors<br />

Stress tests should only measure the effects of large-scale <strong>and</strong>/or extraordinary<br />

changes in risk factors. The bankÕs everyday risk management tools can (<strong>and</strong><br />

should) capture the effects of ÒnormalÓ changes.<br />

Acceptance<br />

In order to encourage management to acknowledge as a sensible tool for<br />

improving the bankÕs risk situation as well, stress tests primarily have to be plausible<br />

<strong>and</strong> comprehensible. Therefore, management should be informed as early<br />

as possible about stress tests <strong>and</strong> — if possible — be actively involved in developing<br />

these tests in order to ensure the necessary acceptance.<br />

Reporting<br />

Once the stress tests have been carried out, their most relevant results should be<br />

reported to the management. This will provide them with an overview of the<br />

special risks involved in credit transactions. This information should be submitted<br />

as part of regular reporting procedures.<br />

Definition of Countermeasures<br />

Merely analyzing a bankÕs risk profile in crisis situations is not sufficient. In addition<br />

to stress-testing, it is also important to develop potential countermeasures<br />

(e.g. the reversal or restructuring of positions) for crisis scenarios. For this purpose,<br />

it is necessary to design sufficiently differentiated stress tests in order to<br />

enable targeted causal analyses for potential losses in crisis situations.<br />

Regular Updating<br />

As the portfolioÕs composition as well as political <strong>and</strong> economic conditions can<br />

change at any time, stress tests have to be adapted to the current situation on an<br />

ongoing basis in order to identify <strong>and</strong> evaluate changes in the bankÕs risk profile<br />

in a timely manner.<br />

Documentation <strong>and</strong> Approval<br />

The objectives, procedures, responsibilities, <strong>and</strong> all other aspects associated<br />

with stress tests have to be documented <strong>and</strong> submitted for management approval.<br />

132 Guidelines on Credit Risk Management

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!