14.06.2012 Views

Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank

Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank

Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Rating</strong> <strong>Models</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Validation</strong><br />

Chart 45: Conditional Default Rates (Example: Default Rates on a Logarithmic Scale)<br />

When the Markov property is applied to the transition matrix, the conditional<br />

default rates converge toward the portfolioÕs average default probability<br />

for all rating classes as the time horizon becomes longer. In this process, the<br />

portfolio attains a state of balance in which the frequency distribution of the<br />

individual rating classes no longer shifts noticeably due to transitions. In practice,<br />

however, such a stable portfolio state can only be observed in cases where<br />

the rating class distribution remains constant in new business <strong>and</strong> general circumstances<br />

remain unchanged over several years (i.e. seldom).<br />

6 Validating <strong>Rating</strong> <strong>Models</strong><br />

The term ÒvalidationÓ is defined in the minimum requirements of the IRB<br />

approach as follows:<br />

The institution shall have a regular cycle of model validation that includes monitoring<br />

of model performance <strong>and</strong> stability; review of model relationships; <strong>and</strong> testing<br />

of model outputs against outcomes. 66<br />

Chart 46 below gives an overview of the essential aspects of validation.<br />

The area of quantitative validation comprises all validation procedures in<br />

which statistical indicators for the rating procedure are calculated <strong>and</strong> interpreted<br />

on the basis of an empirical data set. Suitable indicators include the<br />

modelÕs a <strong>and</strong> b errors, the differences between the forecast <strong>and</strong> realized default<br />

rates of a rating class, or the Gini coefficient <strong>and</strong> AUC as measures of discriminatory<br />

power.<br />

In contrast, the area of qualitative validation fulfills the primary task of<br />

ensuring the applicability <strong>and</strong> proper application of the quantitative methods<br />

in practice. Without a careful review of these aspects, the ratingÕs intended purpose<br />

cannot be achieved (or may even be reversed) by unsuitable rating procedures<br />

due to excessive faith in the model. 67<br />

66 Cf. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, draft directive on regulatory capital requirements, Annex D-5, No. 18.<br />

67 Cf. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Annex D-5, No. 41 ff.<br />

94 Guidelines on Credit Risk Management

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!