Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank
Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank
Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chart 35: Creating the Analysis <strong>and</strong> <strong>Validation</strong> Samples<br />
— If restrictions apply to the number of cases which banks can collect in the<br />
data collection stage, a higher proportion of bad cases should be collected.<br />
In practice, approximately one fourth to one third of the analysis sample<br />
comprises bad cases. The actual definition of these proportions depends<br />
on the availability of data in rating development. This has the advantage<br />
of maximizing the reliability with which the statistical procedure can identify<br />
the differences between good <strong>and</strong> bad borrowers, even for small quantities<br />
of data. However, this approach also requires the calibration <strong>and</strong><br />
rescaling of calculated default probabilities (cf. section 5.3).<br />
As an alternative or a supplement to splitting the overall sample, the bootstrap<br />
method (resampling) can also be applied. This method provides a way of<br />
using the entire database for development <strong>and</strong> at the same time ensuring the<br />
reliable validation of scoring functions.<br />
In the bootstrap method, the overall scoring function is developed using the<br />
entire sample without subdividing it. For the purpose of validating this scoring<br />
function, the overall sample is divided several times into pairs of analysis <strong>and</strong><br />
validation samples. The allocation of cases to these subsamples is r<strong>and</strong>om.<br />
The coefficients of the factors in the scoring function are each calculated<br />
again using the analysis sample in a manner analogous to that used for the overall<br />
scoring function. Measuring the fluctuation margins of the coefficients resulting<br />
from the test scoring functions in comparison to the overall scoring function<br />
makes it possible to check the stability of the scoring function.<br />
The resulting discriminatory power of the test scoring functions is determined<br />
using the validation samples. The mean <strong>and</strong> fluctuation margin of the<br />
resulting discriminatory power values are likewise taken into account <strong>and</strong> serve<br />
as indicators of the overall scoring functionÕs discriminatory power for unknown<br />
data, which cannot be determined directly.<br />
In cases where data availability is low, the bootstrap method provides an<br />
alternative to actually dividing the sample. Although this method does not<br />
<strong>Rating</strong> <strong>Models</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Validation</strong><br />
Guidelines on Credit Risk Management 73